The Scientific Evaluation Standard of Medical Articles for Public: a Delphi Study
Xin Xu,Qiyu li,Fei Qi,Wen-li Yu,Ying Zhang,Yang Li,Xin-ying Sun,Yi-bo Wu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-954690/v1
2021-01-01
Abstract:Abstract Background At present, the quality of articles in the field of medical popularization in China cannot be guaranteed, so it is necessary for experts engaged in scientific popularization to estabish a consensus on scientfic evaluation criteria to improve it.Objective This article aims to improve this by reaching a consensus about the scientificalness of medical articles for public through Delphi method among experts.Method The article type is research article.On the basis of AGREE II method, a set of criteria for evaluating the scientificalness of popular science articles was established, and then three rounds of Delphi expert consultation were conducted in order to achieve the final consensus.Results A total of 31 people took part in all three rounds of research, while 4 people lost their visits. Most metric reaches consensus (agreement>80%) in the final round while there remains argument concerning the “Total number of evidence selected”, “Whether a case is regarded as general situation”, “If new research evidence exists”, “The qualification of the platform for the publication of popular science articles” and “Conflict of interest”.Conclusion This study established a unified scientific evaluation standard for medical popular science articles. The study is of great significance to the establishment of operable scientific evaluation standard of popular science articles. Future research should focus on the diversity in specific aspect.