Abstract:Literary criticism was an important part of Western literary theory in the 20th century and has not lost its importance to this day. Criticism has an active influence on the literary process, as well as directly on the formation of public consciousness. This article discusses two important approaches, the principle of literary criticism. The archetypal literary criticism and the theory of intertextuality. Archetypal literary criticism is a theory that interprets a text by focusing on mythological motifs and archetypes in narrative, symbols, imagery, and character types that recur in different literary works. Analysis of the inclusions of intertext in the text of a work of art gives reason to consider them as one of the most important devices in the writer's stylistic system. The ability to integrate elements of another text into one's own work and introduce one's own text into the public consciousness is called "intertextualization" within the framework of this theory. Intertextuality is a common property of texts, expressed in the presence of links between them, due to which texts (or parts of them) can explicitly or implicitly refer to each other in a variety of ways. It is worth noting that the archetypal literary criticism and the theory of intertextuality have deep internal theoretical connections, which boil down to three main points: these are literary repetitions, general views on literature, and the consideration of literature as a repository of memory. Although these theories arose in the era of different cultural and historical paradigms - structuralism and post-structuralism, they have much in common in terms of connotation. Being different theoretical systems of literary criticism, archetypal criticism and intertextuality are closely connected by the presence of an element of psychological criticality in both. This article searches for similarities between the two indicated systems in these three aspects and substantiates their theoretical connection, which proves the complementary nature of these two theories.

Dialogues Between Intersubjective Consciousnesses Via Literary Texts: an Analysis on Jean-Pierre Richard's Thematic Criticism

Phenomenology of Intersubjectivity of Literature

Solipsistic and Symbiotic: Intersubjective Idea of Neo-phenomenology

Interdisciplinary Reflection on Ethical Literary Criticism and Literary Theory Framework

On literary ethical criticism

Towards an Ethical Literary Criticism

Ethical Literary Criticism: A Basic Theory

Ethical Literary Criticism: Its Fundaments and Terms

Ethical Literary Criticism: International Perspectives

A Brief Discussion of the Generation of Meaning in Literary Works: A Hermeneutic Examination

ETHICAL LITERARY CRITICISM Oral Literature and the Formation Mechanism of Brain Text

Archetypal literary criticism and intertextuality

Ethical Literary Criticism: Oral Literature and Brain Text

Between Rational Analysis and Intuitive Perspicacity——Study on the mode of literary criticism in the passage entitled Zhiyin Wenxindiaolun

The Intrinsic Relationship Between Literary Theory and Criticism — Based on the Analysis of Bressler's "Literary Criticism: An Introduction to Theory and Practice"

Ethical Literary Criticism: the Main Concept and the Notion of Didactics

Virtuality and Truth. On Literature in Merleau-Ponty’s Indirect Ontology

Textual Meaning in the Complex System of Literature

Introduction: Ethical Literary Criticism, Brain Text, and New Readings of World Literature

A new key to relations between ingarden's ontology of the literary work and phenomenology

The Rise of a Critical Theory: Reading Introduction to Ethical Literary Criticism