Abstract:Numerous studies have found that the Bayesian framework, which formulates the optimal integration of the knowledge of the world (i.e. prior) and current sensory evidence (i.e. likelihood), captures human behaviours sufficiently well. However, there are debates regarding whether humans use precise but cognitively demanding Bayesian computations for behaviours. Across two studies, we trained participants to estimate hidden locations of a target drawn from priors with different levels of uncertainty. In each trial, scattered dots provided noisy likelihood information about the target location. Participants showed that they learned the priors and combined prior and likelihood information to infer target locations in a Bayes fashion. We then introduced a transfer condition presenting a trained prior and a likelihood that has never been put together during training. How well participants integrate this novel likelihood with their learned prior is an indicator of whether participants perform Bayesian computations. In one study, participants experienced the newly introduced likelihood, which was paired with a different prior, during training. Participants changed likelihood weighting following expected directions although the degrees of change were significantly lower than Bayes-optimal predictions. In another group, the novel likelihoods were never used during training. We found people integrated a new likelihood within (interpolation) better than the one outside (extrapolation) the range of their previous learning experience and they were quantitatively Bayes-suboptimal in both. We replicated the findings of both studies in a validation dataset. Our results showed that Bayesian behaviours may not always be achieved by a full Bayesian computation. Future studies can apply our approach to different tasks to enhance the understanding of decision-making mechanisms. Bayesian decision theory has emerged as a unified approach for capturing a wide range of behaviours under uncertainty. However, behavioural evidence supporting that humans use explicit Bayesian computation is scarce. While it has been argued that knowledge generalization should be treated as hard evidence of the use of Bayesian strategies, results from previous work were inconclusive. Here, we develop a marker that effectively quantifies how well humans transfer learned priors to a new scenario. Our marker can be applied to various tasks and thus can provide a path forwarding the understanding of psychological and biological underpinnings of inferential behaviours.

A Study on the Relationship Between Knowledge Schema and Bayesian Reasoning

Learning bayesian networks using domain knowledge: An empirical study

Conditional Evidence Theory and Its Application in Knowledge Discovery

Learning from conditional probabilities

Covariational reasoning in Bayesian situations

New normative standards of conditional reasoning and the dual-source model

Uncover the reasons for performance differences between measurement functions (Provably)

Dynamic Knowledge Inference Based on Bayesian Network Learning

The impact of prior knowledge on causal structure learning

Studies in subjective probability l: Prediction of random events

The effect of a Schema-based method on correcting persistent errors in mental arithmetic: an experimental study

Are we really Bayesian? Probabilistic inference shows sub-optimal knowledge transfer

Infant Statisticians: The Origins of Reasoning Under Uncertainty

SAT-based Algorithm for Knowledge Reasoning

Inference of Abstraction for a Unified Account of Reasoning and Learning

How experts and novices judge other people's knowledgeability from language use

Reasoning Disaster Chains with Bayesian Network Estimated Under Expert Prior Knowledge

Bayesian inference of Kansei knowledge by using variable precision rough sets

Doing Experiments and Revising Rules with Natural Language and Probabilistic Reasoning

Qualitative Propagation and Scenario-based Explanation of Probabilistic Reasoning

Evidential Reasoning in a Network Usage Prediction Testbed