The modern context and ancient resources of Chinese literature
Huang Manjun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02529200903565103
2010-02-01
Social Sciences in China
Abstract:进入和转换古代文学资源是文学现代性的题中应有之义。在20世纪,中国现代 文学大致有四种进入古代文学资源的范式:在马克思主义批判地继承文化遗产的思 想指引下,中国现代文学出现了以“精华糟粕”说为代表的社会政治化文学传统观 范式;在西方阐释学等思潮激活下,产生了以“新文学源流”说为代表的精神启蒙 型文学传统观范式;以科学释古与现代审美相结合为特征的“释古立美”类文学传 统观范式,则是着重从传统内部进行解释和转化、更新和创造;此外还有一种以日 常生活叙事为特征的民间常态化文学传统观范式,显示出古今文学贯通的文化整体 性。在多种范式的共生互补、竞相发展中,重要的是在“互动”、“原创”中凸显 问题意识,通过对古代文学资源的进入与激活,实现现实生命价值的重构。 关键词: 现代性语境 古代文学资源 传统观范式 互动原创 现实生命价值 To enter into and utilize the resources of ancient literature is a necessity for literary modernity. In the twentieth century, modern Chinese literature generally adopted four paradigms in pursuit of this objective: the socio‐political paradigm that viewed traditional literature in terms of “quintessence‐dross” under the guidance of the Marxist doctrine of the critical inheritance of cultural heritage; the “spiritual awakening” paradigm that, being inspired by Western schools of thought such as hermeneutics, viewed traditional literature as “the source of new literature”; the scientific‐aesthetic paradigm that viewed traditional literature as combining scientific interpretation and modern aesthetics and focused on interpretation, transformation, innovation and creation from within; and the folk paradigm that viewed literary tradition as a narrative of daily life demonstrating the way in which ancient and modern literature were connected in a cultural whole. What is important in the complementary and competitive development of these coexisting paradigms is highlighting “problem consciousness” in “interaction” and “original creation” and the reconstruction of the value of real human life through entering into and reactivating the resources of ancient literature.