Theories of the Heart-mind and Human Nature in the Context of Globalization of Confucianism Today

Peimin Ni
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-020-09760-x
2021-01-15
Dao
Abstract:About 60 years ago, T<span class="u-small-caps">ang</span> Junyi 唐君毅 (T<span class="u-small-caps">ang</span> Chun-i), M<span class="u-small-caps">ou</span> Zongsan 牟宗三 (M<span class="u-small-caps">ou</span> Tsung-san), X<span class="u-small-caps">u</span> Fuguan 徐復觀 (H<span class="u-small-caps">su</span> Fu-kuan), and Z<span class="u-small-caps">hang</span> Junmai 張君勱 (Carson Chang) published "A Manifesto for a Reappraisal of Sinology and Reconstruction of Chinese Culture." In the Manifesto, these major representatives of contemporary New Confucianism tried to rectify Westerners' biases and reestablish Chinese people's cultural confidence by upholding the Confucian learning of the heart-mind as the core of Chinese culture. Following the same approach, some prominent scholars today continue the effort of bringing Confucianism to a new epoch through reappropriating metaphysical theories of the heart-mind and human nature of the Zisi 子思–Mencius lineage, which flourished in the Song-Ming 宋明 period. This article critically reflects on this approach and argues that the Confucian learning of the heart-mind and human nature should not be taken so much as a mirror that reflects metaphysical reality than as a lever that directs and uplifts human vision and <i>gongfu</i> 功夫/工夫 (the art of life). In the cultural context today, revealing the <i>gongfu</i> nature of Confucianism can help us appreciate the real value of Confucianism as a constructive resource for global culture.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?