Abstract:This article examines most of the key principles with respect to China's investment funds legislation as well as the amendments.Here are the conclusions:(i) rather than an unintended result,the current Securities Investment Funds Law is in fact a natural and logical product of the Chinese legislature's initial legislative intent;(ii) it is crucial to understand the differences among the three organizational forms of investment funds-companies,partnerships and unit trusts-and to avoid a narrow understanding that investment funds are all adopting the form of unit trusts;(iii) an investment fund is per se a"collective investment scheme"rather than a simple"pool of capital";(iv) any legislation and supervision should fully take into account the fundamental difference in risks posed by public offering and private placement investment funds respectively;(v) in order to regulate illegal fundraising activities,it is more effective to amend the Securities Law rather than the Securities Investment Funds Law;(vi) the elimination of various policy and regulatory obstacles impairing the development of investment funds should be achieved by improving the relevant legal system,rather than relying solely on amendments to the Securities Investment Funds Law;(vii) tax incentives should be accorded to venture capital funds instead of securities investment funds(which have already received outsized tax holidays);(viii) to promote private equity and venture capital investments,a more realistic approach would be to formulate specific legislation to govern this sort of activities,rather than using uniform legislation to cover all types of funds even though they are of fundamentally different natures;and(ix) even if uniform legislation is eventually called for,the legislature should take into consideration differences between private equity/venture capital fund and security investment fund and formulate laws accordingly.

An Analysis on Organization Models of Private Equity Fund from a Perspective of Governance Structure

Disproportionate Ownership Structure and IPO Long-Run Performance of Non-Soes in China

Do Private Equity Investors Conspire with Ultimate Owners in the IPO Process?

The Evolution of Corporate Governance in China : the Role of Institutional Investors

Discussions on the Incorporation of Private Equity Funds in China

An Analysis of the Private Education Institute Ownership and Its Governance in China

Legal Issues on Private Equity Investment Funds in China

MOTIVATION AND CHARACTERS ANALYSIS OF CONTROLLING SHAREHOLDERS IN PRIVATE PLACEMENT

How to Explain Corporate Investment Heterogeneity in China's New Normal: Structural Models with State-Owned Property Rights

Operational and Managerial Model of Government Leading Fund of Venture Capital

An analysis of the Structure of the Property and Administration of Chinese Private Schools in a Perspective of the Characteristics of Nonprofit Organizations

Establishing Effective Corporate Governance of China A Point of View from Law and Economics

Empirical Study on Private Equity Fund and Corporate Real Investment

Market Structure-Conduct-Performance of Investment Fund Industry in China: an Empirical Analysis Based on Data from 1999 to 2004

Operating Mechanism and Value Creating of Private Equity Funds

A study of the Securities Investment Funds Law and its amendment

The Legal Dilemma of Private Equity Fund Financing in China and Its Response

Comparison of Models of Ownership Structure in Health Care and Its Chinese Choices

Risk Management Based on Private Equity Fund Investments

IPO Pricing Efficiency and Ownership Structure: Evidence from China

The Model of Board Structure on the Condition of Several Large Shareholders Existing