Clinical characteristics of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis and comparison in diagnostic methods

ZHU Hai-long,SUN Zhi-jun,JIANG Bo,WANG Zhi-feng,WANG Jin-da
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.1674-4055.2013.02.018
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective To analyze Clinical characteristics of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS) and the diagnostic accuracy of renal artery ultrasound examination and renal artery computed tomography angiography (CTA) . Methods The patients (n=179) with ARAS diagnosed by renal artery CTA (renal artery stenosis>50%) were chosen from Fan. 2005 to Oct. 2010. The clinical symptoms were analyzed retrospectively, and the difference between renal artery ultrasound examination or renal artery CTA and renal artery angiography was compared. Results Among 179 patients, 74 (41.34%) with unmanageable hypertension, 96 (53.63%) with chest pain, 6 (3.35%) with acute pulmonary edema and 102 (57%) with renal lesion. After the renal artery ultrasound examination in 124 patients, the results showed that when kidney blood flow velocity was over 171 cm/s, the area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve reached the maximum, and the sensitivity and specificity of renal artery ultrasound examination was respectively 86% and 75%. At the same time, 23 cases (46 vessels) were given renal artery CTA and the results showed that stenosis vessels by CTA were more than those by renal artery angiography [32(69.6%) vs . 26 (56.5%) ] but the difference was no significant (P=0.082) . Conclusion Renal artery ultrasound examination can reach the highest sensitivity and specificity when kidney blood flow velocity equals to 171 cm/s and is taken as the diagnostic threshold of ARAS, while renal artery CTA has a trend of over-diagnosis compared with renal artery angiography.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?