Abstract:China's urbanization and industrialization process is replacing large amounts of farmland, which is strongly driven by the country's land finance regime, with the intensified regional/local competition for manufacturing investment opportunities pushing local governments to expropriate farmland at low prices while leasing land at high market value to property developers. The additional revenue obtained in this way, termed financial increment in land value, can drive local economic growth and provide associated infrastructure and other public services. At the same time, however, a floating population of large numbers of inadequately compensated land-lost farmers, although unable to become citizens, have to migrate into urban areas for work, causing overheated employment and housing markets, with rocketing unaffordable housing prices. This, together with various micro factors relating to the party/state's promotion/evaluation system, plays an essential role leading to serious economic, environment and social consequences, e.g., for migrant welfare, the displacement of peasants and loss of land resources, in need of immediate attention.Our question, therefore, is whether such type of urbanization is sustainable. What are the mechanisms behind China's phenomenal urbanization process? From the perspective of institutionalism, this paper investigates the institutional background of the urban growth dilemma and solutions in urban China by introducing an inter-regional game theoretical framework to indicate why the present urbanization pattern is unsustainable. Looking forward to 2030, major policy changes are made from the triple consideration of the floating population, social security and urban environmental pressures. This involves (1) changing the land increment based finance regime into a land stock finance system, (2) the citizenization of migrant workers with affordable housing and (3) creating a more enlightened local government officer appraisal system to better take into account societal issues such as welfare and beyond. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Youth's Poverty,High Housing Price and Social Justice:Based on Marxist theory of justice

Study on the Affordable Housing Policy in China’s Urbanization Process

Analysis on the Influencing Factors and Causes of China’s High Housing Prices

An Institutional Countermeasure to China's High Urban Housing Prices

An Idea on Housing Vouchers Policy Making: Based on New-Type Urbanization

Housing Inequality in Urban China: Theoretical Debates, Empirical Evidences, and Future Directions

A Mechanistic Study of the Coexistence of High House Prices, Low Income, and High Homeownership Rates in China

Urban Growth Dilemmas and Solutions in China: Looking Forward to 2030

Fairness and Justice in the Areas of Social Stratification and Social Space

Housing Price, Consumption, and Financial Market: Evidence from Urban Household Data in China

Power persistence through an intergenerational perspective: inequality in private housing assets in post-reform China

Capital Exploitation and Poverty Problem from the Perspective of History：A Discussion on the Question of Marx’s Poverty Theory with Mr .He Zuoxiu

Housing unaffordability and adolescent academic achievement in urban China

A Critique On China's Urban Renewal From Social Space Justice Viewpoint

Customizing Public Rental Housing for the Youth:A Study on the Youth's Public Rental Housing Design from Living Needs

Affordability of Housing and Accessibility of Public Services: Evaluation of Housing Programs in Beijing

An Assessment on the Social Effects of"Collecting Private Spare Housing as Public Rental Housing"in the Perspective of Mixed-income Residence: A Case Study of Changzhou, Jiangsu

Is Poverty Concentrated in Shanghai? Spatial Patterns in Social Housing and Their Implications for Social Equality in Chinese Cities

Income Inequality and Housing Affordability in Beijing - an Empirical Study from Household Survey

Housing Inequality in Urban China

A Study of the Social Justice in Fund System of Housing Accumulation——Angle of View Social Exclusion Theory