Adsorbate–adsorbate repulsions—the coverage dependence of the adsorption structure of CO on Cu(110) as studied by electron‐stimulated desorption ion angular distribution
Joachim Ahner,Dan Mocuta,R. D. Ramsier,John T. Yates
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.472464
IF: 4.304
1996-10-15
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Abstract:The coverage dependent orientation of CO adsorbed on a Cu(110) surface was studied by the electron-stimulated desorption ion angular distribution (ESDIAD) technique. A neutral excited (CO*) species is imaged and in addition positive ions are measured. The adsorption temperature was varied between 32 K and 150 K. By applying the ESDIAD technique at a temperature below 80 K it was possible to decrease the beamwidths drastically, to determine the angular distributions better than ±0.5°, and to study the adsorption of CO chemisorbed and physisorbed on the surface. With increasing CO coverage we observe three distinct ESDIAD patterns. Starting from a normal beam pattern with an elliptical cross section with the major axis oriented in the 〈11̄0〉 direction for coverages up to 0.2 monolayer (ML), a transformation of the ESDIAD pattern into a pattern of two separated beams is observed for a coverage of about 0.5 ML, indicating a tilting of the molecules in the 〈11̄0〉 directions by ∼9°. With further increasing CO coverage an additional central peak develops with an elliptical broadening now in the 〈001〉 direction. The changes of the pattern are reversible as shown by decreasing the coverage by thermal desorption. Based on these ESDIAD and digital low energy electron diffraction results, a linear-chain model for CO adsorption is proposed. Temperature programmed desorption measurements also indicate the presence of repulsive CO–CO interactions in the adlayer.
chemistry, physical,physics, atomic, molecular & chemical