An Empirical Investigation into the Relationship between QMP and Performance with Firm Characteristics as a Variant

Xiong Wei,Feng Xiaobin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.2011.08.071
2012-01-01
Abstract:Quality Management Practice(QMP),is a set of practices and measures that firms adopt to accomplish quality goals and plays a key role in improving business performance and competitiveness.To explore the internal mechanism of the impact of QMP on business performance,Flynn et al.have classified QMP into soft factors and hard factors.The former focuses on measures related to non-mechanism and social behaviors and others,while the latter focuses on measures related to mechanism,process and technology and others.Though some studies have shown that both soft and hard elements of QMP affect performance,controversy remains on their functional mechanism.Moreover,there has been little research done on the effect of firm characteristics on QMP and performance. This research systematically investigates the constitution of the soft and hard elements of QMP based on Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award(MBNQA) Criteria.Based on an empirical study of 424 manufacturing companies in Zhejiang province,this paper examines the relationship between QMP and performance with firm characteristics as a variant.We make use of spssmaro script which is developed by Preacher to test the mediating effect of quality performance and by the aid of sub-group regression we examine the moderating effects of firm characteristics as a variant.The results indicate that soft and hard elements of QMP are not only positively associated with firm performance,but also have an indirect effect on firm performance through quality performance.Through the comparison test of sub-group regression coefficient,we found that:(1) Compared with the effect on smaller firms,the QMP has a greater significant moderating effect on the firm performance of larger firms.(2) Firm size significantly moderates the relationship between QMP and firm performance.(3) The implementation time of QMP has a significant effect on the relationship between QMP and performance.The earlier it implemented,the better the performance of the firm.(4) The differences of QMP's moderating effect on performances of publicly-owned firms and private firms,and on performances of capital-intensive firms and labour-intensive firms are not significant. The key implications of these results are that compared to developed countries,firm size has different effects on manufacturing companies.Therefore domestic manufacturing companies need to adjust the implementation of QMP based on the firm's characteristics.There is no significant relation between the nature of the firm and the degree of capital intensity on the relationship between QMP and firm performance.This confirms that QMP has a certain ″universality″ in the context of China.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?