Abstract:Much of the literature exploring Chinese international student engagement with critical thinking in Western universities draws on reductive essentialisations of 'Confucianism' in efforts to explain cross-cultural differences. In this paper I review literature problematising these tendencies. I then shift focus from inferences about how philosophy shapes culture and individual students, toward drawing on philosophy as a 'living' resource for understanding and shaping the ideal of critical thinking. A cross disciplinary approach employs historical overview and philosophical interpretation within and beyond the Confucian tradition to exemplify three types of criticality common in Chinese philosophy. These are criticality within tradition, criticality of tradition, and critical integration of traditions. The result is a refutation of claims or inferences (intentional or implicit) that Chinese philosophy is not conducive to criticality. While this paper focuses on types of criticality, it also reveals a common method of criticality within Chinese philosophy, in the form of 'creation through transmission'. This resonates with recent research calling for less confrontational and more dialogical engagement with critical processes. However, I also draw attention to examples of confrontational argumentation within Chinese philosophy, which may provide valuable resources for educators and students. Finally, I conclude careful and explicit consideration is needed regarding the types of criticality sought within Western universities to prevent educators and students from 'speaking past' one and other instead of 'speaking with' one and other in critical dialogue.

To ‘fall in Line’ or to ‘grab’: Thoughts on the Indigenization of Political Science

Thirty Years of Political Science in China: from Learning from the West to Indigenization

Review Essay: How to Merge Western Theories and Chinese Indigenous Theories to Study Chinese Politics?

The State of the Field of Chinese Political Science: “glocalising” Political Science in China?

Thoughts On Indigenous Research Of Educational Sociology

Research on the Indigenization of Personality Studies

The Difficulty of the Indigenization of Library Science in China

Indigenization and authentization of epistemology in China’s social work: Moving beyond Confucianism, Taoism, and Chinese Buddhism

Indigenization of Sociology and Chinese Intellectual Traditions: an Endless Scholarly Pursuit（1930-2022） Chinese Full Text

Political Science and Chinese Political Studies—Where Is Chinese Political Science Headed?

Indigenization and Beyond: Methodological Relationalism in the Study of Personality Across Cultural Traditions

New Agenda for the Study of Chinese Governance

Importing Western values versus indigenization: Social work practice with ethnic minorities in Hong Kong

A Global Perspective of the Independence of Social Sciences in China

Exploring Criticality in Chinese Philosophy: Refuting Generalisations and Supporting Critical Thinking

From Politics to Political Science:Problems of Chinese Political Research and Its Paradigm Alternatives

Theories of Indigenous Technological Innovation

An Analysis of the Indigenization of Leader-Member Exchange Concept

China Studies:Possible stands and paradigm reconstruction

Constructing Indigenous Psychological Theories From A Global Perspective: Taking Filial Piety Model As An Example

With the Rise of China, What'S New for Comparative Politics?