Abstract:Background The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) has become one of the most widely used measurement tools in child and adolescent mental health work across the globe. The SDQ was originally developed and validated within the UK and whilst its reliability and validity have been replicated in several countries important cross cultural issues have been raised. We describe normative data, reliability and validity of the Chinese translation of the SDQ (parent, teacher and self report versions) in a large group of children from Shanghai. Methods The SDQ was administered to the parents and teachers of students from 12 of Shanghai's 19 districts, aged between 3 and 17 years old, and to those young people aged between 11 and 17 years. Retest data was collected from parents and teachers for 45 students six weeks later. Data was analysed to describe normative scores, bandings and cut-offs for normal, borderline and abnormal scores. Reliability was assessed from analyses of internal consistency, inter-rater agreement, and temporal stability. Structural validity, convergent and discriminant validity were assessed. Results Full parent and teacher data was available for 1965 subjects and self report data for 690 subjects. Normative data for this Chinese urban population with bandings and cut-offs for borderline and abnormal scores are described. Principle components analysis indicates partial agreement with the original five factored subscale structure however this appears to hold more strongly for the Prosocial Behaviour, Hyperactivity – Inattention and Emotional Symptoms subscales than for Conduct Problems and Peer Problems. Internal consistency as measured by Cronbach's α coefficient were generally low ranging between 0.30 and 0.83 with only parent and teacher Hyperactivity – Inattention and teacher Prosocial Behaviour subscales having α > 0.7. Inter-rater correlations were similar to those reported previously (range 0.23 – 0.49) whilst test retest reliability was generally lower than would be expected (range 0.40 – 0.79). Convergent and discriminant validity are supported. Conclusion We report mixed findings with respect the psychometric properties of the Chinese translation of the SDQ. Reliability is a particular concern particularly for Peer Problems and self ratings by adolescents. There is good support for convergent validity but only partial support for structural validity. It may be possible to resolve some of these issues by carefully examining the wording and meaning of some of the current questions.

Reliability and Validity of Individualism and Collectivism Scale in Chinese Students

A Preliminary Study on Self-constructionals Scales (scs)of Chinese-Version

Key Dimensions and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Individualism-Collectivism Scale

Examining the Structure, Reliability, and Validity of the Chinese Personal Growth Initiative Scale–II: Evidence for the Importance of Intentional Self-Change among Chinese

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Solution‐Focused Inventory in College Students

Reliability and Vaiidatioa of the Social Comparison Orientation Scale

Validation of the Emotional Intelligence Scale

Reliability and validity of communal narcissism scale in Chinese university students

Validity and reliability of the Social Suspiciousness Scale in college students

The Self-construal Scale: An Examination of Its Reliability and Validity Among Chinese University Students

Reliability and validity of the Self-liking/Self-competence Scale-Revised in Chinese middle school students

Reliablity and Validity of the Domain-Specific Risk-taking Scale in Chinese College Students

Reliability and validity of the Chinese Version of Cognitive Style Questionnaire in college students

Preliminary analysis of validity and reliability of revised “Situational Self-Awareness Scale”

Reliability and Validity of the Cognitive Style Questionnaire in Chinese College Students

Reliability and Validity of Short Version of the Experiences in Close Relationships Scale for Children in Chinese Middle School Students

The Reliability and Validity of Chinese Translation of RSQ-SSV in Undergraduate Student

The Reliability and Validity of the Social Dominance Orientation Scale in China

The Validity, Reliability and Normative Scores of the Parent, Teacher and Self Report Versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in China.

Reliability and Validity of Normative Beliefs about Aggression Scale among Middle School Students

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Revised Defensive Pessimism Questionnaire(Social)