Abstract:Due to the joint efforts made by the scholars of administrative law over the past two decades,theoretical frame on determination of administrative decision and revocation of rules has become more mature. The contents of this theoretical frame is that if any mistakes is found in an administrative act that has been established, the administrative organ should follow relevant rescinding rules rather than the principle of "collecting mistakes whenever discovered". However, according to administrative judgments and official replies and answers issued by the Supreme People’s Court, it is clear that the Supreme People’s Court insisted on the principle of "collecting mistakes whenever discovered" rather than was influenced by the theoretical frame mentioned earlier. The Court does not alter its view until the case of Jiao Zhigang was published as a guiding case on the Supreme People’s Court Gazette. According to the judgment of the case of Jiao Zhigang, once an administrative act has been legally made and come into force, the administrative act cannot be withdrawn at will, it is binding not only on the affected person(s), but also on the administrative organ itself. However, the relevant judgments made by the courts at various levels show that the case of Jiao Zhigang has not been frequently referred to in the judgments, and the principle of "collecting mistakes whenever discovered" is still deeply rooted. It is possibly because the guiding cases are lacking in practical value and statutory tradition. However, the rules made in the case of Jiao Zhigang are still valuable, and its value has not only represented the impact of the theory on the decisions by the courts, but also acted as a sign of the development of the idea of rule of law.

Analysis of the Judicial Review of Administrative Guidance

On the Litigation Relief of Administrative Guidance in China

On "Refusal to Apply Rules" in Administrative Litigation:Based on the Analysis of No.5 Guiding Case Published by the Supreme People's Court

On the Reconsiderability of Administrative Guidance

The Basic Modification Direction of The Administrative Procedure Law——Discussing Article 1 of The Administrative Procedure Law

The Boundary of “Collecting Mistakes Whenever Discovered”

The Administrative Guidance Conduct in Legal View--On Legitimacy of Administrative Guidance and Way to Legalizing Administrative Guidance in China

Judicial Review System of the abstract administrative Act and Its Improvement In China

On Judicial Review of Abstract Administrative Act in China

Research on Judicial Review of Manifestly Improper Administrative Acts

Administrative Law and the Chinese Legal System: Some Issues on Judicial Review of Administration Activity

Judicial Review on Abuse of Power by Administrative Authority

On Legal Supervision and Control of Administrative Legislation in China

The Essential Constituents of a Lawful Administrative Action

Analysis on the Types of Administrative Litigation——Taking the Administrative Trials in Zhangzhou As an Example

The Present Situation of Abstract Administrative Action Supervision in Our country and the Construction of Judicial Review

The Implementation and Reformation of Administrative Litigation Law in China

The Standards and Methods of Judicial Review:From the Perspective of American Administrative Law

Judicial Review of Abstract Administrative Acts

A Study on the Administrative Public Interest Litigation System

The problems and countermeasures of administrative guidance procedure of China