An Integrated Assessment and Comparison of Urban Ecosystem Functions for Sixteen Coastal Cities in Chinese Mainland and Taiwan
Feng Li
2010-01-01
Abstract:An urban ecosystem is the complex and over-arching system that combines social,economic,and natural subsystems,each having special problems of supply and waste discharge into and out of the system caused by various sources. To understand the complexity of urban ecosystem functions,a series of indicators is needed for an integrated assessment and comparison. Usually,a healthy urban ecosystem in proper working order shows the following characteristics:a higher environmental efficiency,a stronger economic vitality,and a better quality of life. Each of these factors could be considered the function of an urban ecosystem,especially in relation to sustainable development. Cities along the eastern coast of Chinese mainland and western coast of China Taiwan are similar because of relatively high development level,which have more attraction and influence for regional population and industry. Due to the differences in natural background conditions and development orientation,there are also some specific problems existing in the urban development of Chinese mainland and Taiwan. For a long time,urban development in Taiwan has been heavily affected by physical restriction,especially geological and meteorological disaster as well as sea levels rise; in relative terms,cities in mainland China have been beset with more problems from various environmental pollution and degradation. Since sustainable urban development is required to complement the advantages and learn each other's experience,comparison on urban ecosystem functions among the typical coastal cities could provide policy makers the reference for planning urban development in the future. In this research,focusing on sixteen cities in the coastal areas of Chinese mainland and Taiwan,we developed an indicator scheme for integrated assessment of urban ecosystem functions. The indicator scheme was established based on urban ecological principles,urban development sustainability models,and eco-city assessment indicators. This scheme quantified and measured environment services,metabolic capability,social carrying capacity,social stability,cultural sustainability,opulence levels,and industrial competition. In addition,some alternative index,such as area and population,were used to improve data comparability for adapting different statistical standards. Finally,this scheme was applied to compare on levels of social well-being and social conflicts,economic potential and competition,and environmental sustainability ( environmental degradation and resource deprivation). The results from the analysis suggested that cities in Taiwan have higher values in social and economic subsystems than cities in Chinese mainland,due to the relatively well-developed urban management system in China Taiwan. It also appeared that Keelung and Shanghai city have both reached a stage of well-balanced development in terms of social,economic,and environmental functions,which could serve as models for urban development in other coastal cities. Further comparison also provides insight into social well-being,economic potential,and environmental problems using each indicator subsystem; for example,Keelung and Wenzhou show higher value in the natural indicator subsystem,whereas Taipei and Xiamen are high in the social indicator subsystem,and Taipei and Beijing possess more development in the economic indicator subsystem. Based on the assessment and comparisons above,suggestions for the future optimization of urban ecosystems were provided for city managers and decision-makers.