Abstract:From the viewpoint of scientific communication theory and academic relations between authors, measuring academic influence of researchers should seek a integrated citation collaboration pattern. However, current studies have two shortcomings, firstly, research evaluation metrics at the individual level such as citations and hindex does not take into account the number of coauthors and the contribution of each author in the byline; secondly, several studies have shown the applicability of centrality measures for coauthorship networks to indicate how centrality measures are useful to re?ect the scholars performance based on their position and in?uence within their collaboration network. But most of them do not consider collaborations frequency and therefore they are not useful for weighted network analysis. This article introduced author order and coauthor frequency of publications into the citation and collaboration measures respectively, proposed two pairs of metrics "harmonic hindex plus harmonic Rindex" and "hdegree plus Rdegree" to measure the more realistic and objective citation influence and collaboration influence. Using a sample of 40 Ph.D. mentors in the field of cardiac and cardiovascular diseases, Spearmans correlation analysis shows significant positive correlation among the indicators measuring traditional citation impact, harmonic citation impact and collaboration impact. The hdegree and Rdegree may reflect collaboration influence that is distinctive from the citation impact. Scientometric and informatric researchers can retrieve and discern the high influential scholars from the aspects of both citation and collaboration, which is helpful for decision making in talents recruitment and research evaluation at the individual level.

Review on Calculating Methods of h-index Based on Co-authorship

Literature Review of Academic Impact Measurement for Authors Based on Both Co-authorship and Citation Relationship

In Those Fields Where Multiple Authorship Is The Rule, The H-Index Should Be Supplemented By Role-Based H-Indices

Modifying H-Index by Allocating Credit of Multi-Authored Papers Whose Author Names Rank Based on Contribution

Fairly Sharing the Credit of Multi-Authored Papers and Its Application in the Modification of H-Index and G-Index

Research on the Evaluation of Scientists Based on Weighted h-index

A review on h-index and its alternative indices

Study on ScholarsˊEvaluation Method Based on Co-author Network

Review on Citation Analysis Indicators for Evaluation Academic Influence

Comparative Study on H-index Correlative Factors of Journal Papers Published by University Library

Research on Credit Distribution of Cooperative Papers According to Authors' Rank

Quantitative analysis of automatic performance evaluation systems based on the h-index

Twodimensional Measurement for Academic Influence of Researchers:Integration of Citation Impact and Collaboration Impact

Analysis of h-index for research awards

h-index and its alternative: A Review

Exploring the limitations of the h-index and h-type indexes in measuring the research performance of authors

A Geometric Counting Method Adaptive to the Author Number

Crediting multi-authored papers to single authors

Analyzing research performance: proposition of a new complementary index

A Comparative Study on the H-index and International University Ranking

Axiomatic Quantification of Co-authors' Relative Contributions