Abstract:On June 13, 2010, the Supreme People's Court, the Supreme People's Procuratorate, the Ministry of Public Security, the Ministry of State Security and the Ministry of Justice jointly issued the Provisions on Issues Concerning the Examination and Evaluation of Evidence in Death Sentence Cases and the Provisions on Issues Concerning the Exclusion of Illegally Obtained Evidence in Criminal Cases , effective as of July 1, 2010. The enforcement of these two provisions on criminal evidence is a huge improvement of Chinese criminal evidence system. These two provisions have clarified the procedures for court to hold illegal evidence, the assignment of burden of proof, and the corresponding standard of proof, which make the exclusionary rules against illegally obtained evidence operable. However, the two provisions on criminal evidence used some ambiguous languages regarding to the issues of the admissibility and the evaluation of evidence. The examination of evidence by judges should be divided into two steps. The first step is to determine the admissibility of evidence, in other words, the evidence should firstly be allowed to be used in the trial. The second step is to determine the reliability and the value of evidence, in other words, it concerns how to evaluate the admitted evidence. Judges should focus on the lawfulness and relevance of evidence in the first step, while focus on the truthfulness and sufficiency of evidence in the second. The rules of admissibility should be rigid, while the standards of reliability and value of evidence should be flexible. The separation of these two steps is good for the development of the evidence law. It shifts the research orientation, promotes the evidence rules, especially the exclusionary rules against illegally obtained evidence, and helps to prevent wrongful convictions by reinforcing legal acquisition of evidence.

A Reconsideration on the Statutory Evidence and the Codification of Admissibility Test

The Value and Positioning of Mental Test Conclusion in the System of Penal Evidence

Analsis of the Direction of Evidentiary System Reform in China from Historical Transformation of Judicial Proving Module

On the Influence of the New Provisions of Evidence on Civil Lawsiut System

On Admissibility and Reliability of Evidence

On the Legitimation of Scientific Evidence

The Institutional Transformation and Theoretical Turn of China's Criminal Evidence Law: from the Perspective of Exclusionary Rule

The Rules of Evidence in Procedural Adjudication

New Doctrine of Legal Evidence

The Significant Reform of Criminal Evidence System and Its Extension

British Exclusionary Rule: Derivative History and System Construction

On the Theories of Examination,Admissibility and Evaluation of Evidence

Issues on the Evaluation of Evidence

Obvious Problems and Improvement Method of Administrative Reconsideration Evidence System in China

The Bright Spots and Difficult Spots in the Modification of Criminal Evidence System

Investigate the Ideas of Evidence Law of Damaska

Modification of Civil Procedure Law and Improvement of Civil Evidence System

The Expert Testimony System in Anglo-American Evidence Law

Judgement on Evidence Attribute ——enlightenment on Comparative Law and Law Methodology

Reflection and Perfection of Evidential Competency System in China

The Validity of Appraisal Conclusions as Evidence