Abstract:Comparison effects have been studied extensively in many fields. In particular, existing operations management articles have discussed the impact of comparison effects on enterprises' production and pricing decisions. Research has also shown that consumers' purchasing decisions are primarily determined by three factors: product quality, selling price, and comparison effects. The current study introduces the concepts of social and temporal comparison effects to examine how comparison effects influence a monopolist’s production quality and pricing strategy for substitutable products. Results reveal the following: (1) Setting different prices for even two types of substitutable products with negligible quality differences can divide customers into three groups under the influence of social comparison effects in a single-stage model. (2) The monopolist should avoid using a price discrimination strategy in which products with a short market life cycle have the same quality but different prices. (3) When the market life cycle of products is sufficiently long in the single-product market and the market with two substitutable products, the monopolist’s optimal choice in the second stage is to keep production quality constant and increase the selling price. Consequently, the number of buyers does not decrease because of temporal comparison effects. Therefore, the firm increases its revenue. (4) For the market with two substitutable products with quality differences, one approximate optimal strategy for the enterprise in the second stage is to keep the selling price constant with the assumption that product quality cannot be adjusted after the first period. At this point, the consumption situation in the market is the same as that in the first stage. Therefore, when no external constraints exist, the monopolist firm can obtain more benefits in the second stage than in the first stage by exploiting the temporal comparison effects of consumers in the second stage. (5) When consumer identity information can be confirmed in the market, social comparison effects, similar to temporal comparison effects, could help the enterprise increase its price and profit while maintaining product quality. These social and temporal comparison effects constrain consumers. Thus, the number of people who continue to buy products does not decrease.

The Substitution of New Product for Old Product

OPTIMAL PRICING AND INVENTORY STRATEGIES FOR INTRODUCING A NEW PRODUCT BASED ON DEMAND SUBSTITUTION EFFECTS

Equilibrium analysis of distribution channels based on product substitutability

Inventory Model of Two Kinds of Single-Period Products Based on an Active Product Substitution Strategy

A Two‐Product Newsvendor Problem with Partial Demand Substitution

Pricing and Inventory Decisions for Substitutable Products Based on MNL Customer Choice Model

Substitution Between Network Externality and Economy of Scale

Effectiveness of Trade-Ins and Price Discounts: A Moderating Role of Substitutability

The Model of Optimal Starting Time of Short Life-cycle Products

Production Quality and Pricing Strategy for Substitutable Products under Comparison Effects

Single-Period Two-Product Inventory Model with Substitution

The Impact of Demand Uncertainty on Product Line Design under Endogenous Substitution

Study on Order Policy of Two-Way Substitutable Products for a Single Retailer

Pricing decision problem for substitutable products based on uncertainty theory

Make or Buy in the Presence of Strategic Competition on Substitutable Products

The Problem of Optimal Adoption Timing of New Technology Based on Bass Model

Impact of Loss Aversion on the Newsvendor Game with Product Substitution

Effects of product substitutability and power relationships on performance in triadic supply chains

A New Solution to Market Definition: An Approach Based on Multi-dimensional Substitutability Statistics

The Optimal Commercialization Timing of New Products Based on Bass Model

Product Substitution in Different Weights and Brands Considering Customer Segmentation and Panic Buying Behavior