A Peephole View in a Wide Field of Vision

Pei-guo Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-4459.2005.03.013
2005-01-01
Abstract:Professor Zongzhen Zhu's criticizing my work Historical Anthropology on Rural Land Rights in Modern Jiangnan, is mainly tow points, the first one is that my theoretical goal is too perfect to attain, the other is that I would rather stick to anthropology than adopt the other subjects. I approve basically the first one. As for the second point, I prefer absorbing the other methodologies such as social history, economic history and so on to defending tenaciously anthropology.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?