Abstract:This article is a research report involving three anthropological studies conducted during the period of “Kuige” and their “re-studies.” By narrating the project, I set forth my views on the connections and differences between Chinese anthropological explorations from two historical periods. These anthropological explorations refer to the study of Lu Village conducted by Fei Xiaotong, that of “West Town” (Xizhou) by Francis L. K. Hsu, and that of “Pai-IPai” (Dai) villages by Tien Ju-Kang. They were all completed in the late 1930s and early 1940s. Each writer extracted a framework to analyze the land system, ancestor worship, and the relationship between humans and gods from the writer’s own field experience. Despite the difference in research methods, all three studies noticed the cultural differences between rural society and modernity. Since 2000, Peking University and Yunnan Minzu University have launched a “Province-university Cooperation Project.” During the project, a research team formed of several young scholars revisited Lu Village, “West Town” (Xizhou), and Namu Village. These writers’ works were based on the data acquired in their fieldwork and drew upon the opinions raised by global anthropologists on “re-study” in recent decades. Considering the dual effects of social change and shifts in academic concepts around “follow-up research,” the scholars put forward several points of view with their ethnographies, which all featured the characteristics of inheritance and reflection. Based on the results of the three “re-studies,” this article emphasizes the importance of the study of public rituals for the research of rural society. This article also attempts to re-examine the methodology of “human ecology,” which profoundly impacts Chinese anthropology and sociology.

Anthropology in the Native Perspective-Comments on Self-consciousness in the Field by Pan Nian-Ying

Several Issues on the Study of the Aborigines in Taiwan

Anthropology in My Imagination--An Interview with Anthropologists (37)

“Otherness of Self” : Reflections on Local Field - work

Chinese Anthropology Should Have Broad Vision

Inheriting and Reflecting: Notes on three ethnographic restudies in Yunnan

Inheritance and Reflection: “Re-Study” of Three Anthropology Fieldwork Sites in China’s Yunnan Province

The Personal History of Caiyen's Captivity and Return to Han and the Archetype of Diaspora of Ethnic Chinese——On Perspective,Position and Comparability of Comparative Literature Studies

Anthropology and National Studies

The Contradictions and Predicament in the Field Study of Anthropology

The Rural Education in Modern China in the Vision of Micro——Enlightenment from Some Anthropology Works

Research on the Indigenization of Personality Studies

The Evolution of Nanjing in the History of Chinese Anthropology

On the Anthropological Spirit in the Art of Yunnan Cultural Protection Expert SONG Daming

The heritagization of cultural politics: anthropological research on Chinese cultural heritage

Educational Complex of a Social Anthropologist——Preliminary Study on Professor Fei Xiaotong's Thoughts on Anthropology of Education

To Learn from the Ancestors or to Borrow from the Foreigners: China'S Self-Identity As A Modern Civilisation

Ethnography Text and Authentic Narration

A COMMENT ON WOLFGANG ISER'S LITERARY ANTHROPOLOGY

Paradigm and Transcendence: an Anthropological Study of the Chinese Society

History, Practice, Limitations, and Prospects: Anthropology in China