A study of the reproductive outcome after different surgical management of tubal pregnancy

QIU Xiao-hong,HAN Li-ying,LI He-lian
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-1989.2006.10.004
2006-01-01
Abstract:[Objective] To investigate the reproductive outcome and it's influencing factors after different surgical management of tubal pregnancy. [Methods] A retrospective study was carried out to analyse the reproductive outcome of women after different surgical management of tube pregnancy. [Results] The intrauterine pregnancy rate is 27.0% in laparotomy group and 51.5% in laparoscopy group. The recurrent ectopic pregnancy rate is 39.7% in laparotomy group and 18.0% in laparoscopy group. The infertility rate is 33.3% in laparotomy group and 30.9% in laparoscopy group. There is a statistic significance between laparotomy and laparoscopy group (P <0.01). The intrauterine pregnancy rate is 50.0% in conservative tubal surgery group and 22.4% in salpingectomy group. The recurrent ectopic pregnancy rate is 21.7% in conservative tubal surgery group and 34.5% in salpingectomy group. The infertility rate is 28.3% in conservative tubal surgery group and 43.1% in salpingectomy group. There is a statistic significance between conservative tubal surgery group and salpingectomy group (P <0.01). The reproductive outcome is better in women without risk factors such as previous pelvic infection, fallopian tube pathology than women with it. [Conclusions] Considering the reproductive outcome in women with tubal pregnancy, laparoscopy is better than laparotomy in the management of tubal pregnancy. Conservative tubal surgery is better than salpingectomy in the management of tubal pregnancy. Women without risk factor related to ectopic pregnancy may have a better prognosis for reproductive outcome.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?