Abstract:We study endogenous merger decisions among three competing firms with asymmetric capacity: One large firm has ample capacity, and two small firms have limited capacity. Each firm can either operate independently or merge with another firm. Due to antitrust laws, all three firms merging is not permitted. When two firms merge, the merged entity and the remaining independent firm use the resulting capacity to capture their own "loyal buyers" and compete in price for price-sensitive "disloyal switchers". We first consider a base model where the size of loyal buyers for different firms is symmetric. We find that either there is no merger or the large firm will merge with a small firm (called mixed merger). We explain how the equilibrium structure is driven by the "price effect" and the "demand effect". Specifically, the mixed merger which can most effectively reduce price competition is the equilibrium for relatively competitive market conditions (i.e., small size of loyal buyers and large but constrained capacity). We also extend to the case with asymmetric size of loyal segments, and show that two small firms merging can be the equilibrium structure when the large firm has a much larger loyal segment than the small firms and the small firms' capacity is sufficiently large. The impacts of mergers on social welfare and consumer surplus provide practical implications from the antitrust perspective. The antitrust agencies who are concerned about social welfare can approve a mixed merger under certain conditions, but if the agencies pay more attention to consumer surplus, then mixed mergers should not be permitted. Small mergers, though sometimes are not the equilibrium structures, can improve both social welfare and consumer surplus. In such cases, the government can appropriately promote mergers that are beneficial for society and/or consumers by adopting some restrictive measures or offering incentives.

Firm Reputation and Horizontal Integration

Vertical Integration and Firm Performance

The strategic impact of vertical integration on non-deceptive counterfeiting

Reputation Mechanism in Network-Based Manufacturing

Vertical Integration and Firm Productivity

Monitoring decisions in vertical integration

Reputation Tournaments in Differentiated Product Markets

Procurement of advanced inputs and welfare-reducing vertical integration

Anticompetitive Effects of Horizontal Acquisitions: the Impact of Within-Industry Product Similarity

Anticompetitive Vertical Integration by a Dominant Firm

Alliance Formation among Competitors: Impact of Limited Capacity and Loyal Segments

Impact of Online Information on the Pricing and Profits of Firms with Different Levels of Brand Reputation

A bargaining perspective on vertical integration

Does Vertical Integration Reduce the Cost of Equity?

Equilibrium vertical structure with a common supplier

Geographic Overlap, Agglomeration Externalities and Merger Restructuring

Promoting a reputation for quality

Reputation and Pricing Dynamics in Online Markets

Manufacturers' vertical integration strategies in competing three‐tier supply chains with asymmetric customer loyalty

Procompetitive effects of vertical takeovers. Evidence from the European Union

When Do Buyer Protection Mechanisms Help Low-Reputation Sellers? --- the Strategic Interaction Between Buyer Protection Mechanism and Reputation Systems