The Contrast of Pupil Constrict Response to the Pilocarpine Between the Young and the Old

Wu Nianlang,Li Yumin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-548X.2007.08.022
2007-01-01
Abstract:Objective Observe the pupil constrict response to the pilocarpin,identify the difference of the response between the young and the old.Methods Use the infrared digital camera of sonyF717 to record the dynamic variety of the pupil constrict response to the 1%pilocarpine liposome and the pilocarpine liquid in dark environment.Then deliver the data to the computer,measure the data by imagetool software,analysis the data by the Sigamastat software.Results In darkness,the pupil diameter of the young is equally 6.8±0.643mm,the old is equally 4.4±0.447mm.T test t=16.1,P<0.0001。The 1%pilocarpine liposome can constrict the pupil to a minimum diameter of equally 3.6±0.828 mm in the young,and equally 2.31±0.340mm in the old.T test t=6.86,P<0.0001.Though,The 1%pilocarpine liquid can constrict the pupil to a minimum diameter of equally 4.03±0.816 mm in the young,and equally 2.35±0.264mm in the old.T test t=4.95,P=0.0005;The pupil constricting range to1%pilocarpine liposome is equally 3.43±0.604mm in the young,equally 2.28±0.307mm in the old.T test t=8.07,P<0.0001;The pupil constricting range to 1%pilocarpine liquid is equally 3.08±0.556mm in the young,equally 2.15 ±0.194 in the old.T test t=3.89,P=0.0025;In statistics there is no deference between the young and the old in pupil initial constricting time,keep constricting time,max constricting time and constricting velocity.Conclusions Young's pupil diameter is bigger than senior's,but in statistics,there is no deference in pupil constricting effect to pilocarpine between the young and the old.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?