Chinese Kindergarteners’ Automatic Processing of Numerical Magnitude
C Chen,Xingming Zhou,Y Chen,H Zhang,Tao Jiang,Qi Dong
2007-01-01
Abstract:Memory & Cognition Chinese kindergartners’ automatic processing of numerical magnitude in Stroop-like tasks X INLIN Z HOU AND Y AO C HEN Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China C HUANSHENG C HEN University of California, Irvine, California AND T ING J IANG , H ONGCHUAN Z HANG , AND Q I D ONG Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China Using Stroop-like tasks, this study examined whether Chinese kindergartners showed automatic processing of numerical magnitude. A total of 36 children (mean age 5 years 10 months) were asked to perform physi- cal size comparison (i.e., “Which of two numbers is bigger in physical size?”) and numerical magnitude tasks (i.e., “Which of two numbers is bigger in numerical magnitude?”) on 216 number pairs. These number pairs varied in levels of congruence between numerical magnitude and physical size (for Stroop effect) and numerical distance (for distance effect). On the basis of analyses of response time and error rates, we found that Chinese kindergartners showed automatic processing of numerical magnitude. These results are significantly different from previous studies’ findings about the onset age (ranging from around the end of first grade to third grade) for automatic processing of numerical magnitude. The processing of numerical magnitude can be either in- tentional or automatic (Girelli, Lucangeli, & Butterworth, 2000; Noel, Rousselle, & Mussolin, 2005). Intentional processing of numerical magnitude occurs when subjects are directed to attend to the magnitude of number(s) (e.g., “Which of two numbers is bigger in magnitude?”; see, e.g., Butterworth, 1999; Moyer & Landauer, 1967). Au- tomatic processing of numerical magnitude occurs when subjects are specifically asked to process nonmagnitude information about numbers (e.g., physical size), but there is evidence of the impact of numerical magnitude (e.g., magnitude information facilitates physical size judgment; Girelli et al., 2000; Noel et al., 2005). Various tasks have been used to study automatic processing of numbers. They include parity judgment (i.e., whether a number is odd or even; see, e.g., Berch, Foley, Hill, & Ryan, 1999; Dehaene, Bossini, & Giraux, 1993; Fias, Brysbaert, Geypens, & d’Ydewalle, 1996), phonetic judgment (i.e., whether a number word has a particular vowel; Fias et al., 1996), identity judgment (i.e., whether two numbers are the same or different; see, e.g., Dehaene & Akhavein, 1995; Duncan & McFarland, 1980), and Stroop-like tasks (e.g., “Which number is bigger in physical size? 3 or 2?”; see, e.g., Besner & Coltheart, 1979; Dehaene, 1997; Henik & Tzelgov, 1982; Schwarz & Heinze, 1998; Tzelgov, Meyer, & Henik, 1992). In Stroop-like tasks, subjects are asked to make compari- sons of pairs of numbers that vary in numerical magnitude and physical size. There are three types of trials: congru- ent trials (e.g., “ 2 ” and “3,” in which 3 is bigger than 2 in both numerical magnitude and physical size); incongruent trials (e.g., “2” and “ 3 ”); and neutral trials (i.e., the pairs of numbers have either the same numerical magnitude or the same physical size, depending on the task). Subjects are asked to perform two kinds of comparisons—physical size comparison (i.e., “Which of the two numbers is bigger in physical size?”) and numerical magnitude comparison (i.e., “Which of the two numbers is bigger in numerical magnitude?”). Typical results show that subjects take less time and make fewer errors during congruent trials than during incongruent trials (see, e.g., Besner & Coltheart, 1979; Henik & Tzelgov, 1982; Schwarz & Heinze, 1998; Tzelgov et al., 1992). The size congruity effect during the physical size comparison tasks indicates that the numeri- cal magnitude of a number is automatically activated to facilitate (under the congruent condition) or to interfere with (under the incongruent condition) the physical size comparison task. Similarly, a size congruity effect during the numerical magnitude comparison task indicates that the physical size of a number is automatically activated to facilitate or to interfere with the numerical magnitude comparison task. Qi Dong , dongqi@bnu.edu.cn Copyright 2007 Psychonomic Society, Inc.