Abstract:The processing of one's own-name is thought to be unique in that it has no need of attentional resource.The evidence from both behavioral and electrophysiological studies has showed that no attention is required for self identification.But there has new evidence from an fMR1 that the differences between one's own and other's name processing may be quantitative than qualitative in nature. And there is evidence that the attentional blink(AB) is not always survived by self identification under the high perceptual load,but the study ignores the familiarity of personal names and therefore is not conclusive about the uniqueness of self identification mechanism.The objective of this study was to inquire into the self identification mechanism by associating it with the Load Theory and RSVP of AB paradigm, and to investigate the advantages of self identification,i.e.,the uniqueness or familiarity of the self identification.We added the names of celebrity to this study.We supposed that in attentional blink paradigm the familiarity with others'names would produce a pattern of processing similar to personal names,which has relative uniqueness. In the present study,each trial consisted of a first target(T1,consisted of 5 arrows) and a second target(T2,a strangers name or a celebrity s name or oneis own-name ) embedded in a rapid series of visual presentation(RSVP) of 20 common nouns.The Eriksen flanker task was used to distinguish the level of Tl perceptual load,in which the participants were asked to determine the orientation of central arrow between other 4 congruent(low-load condition) or incongruent(high-load condition) arrows.All 22 items were presented in the black background of computer screen and immediately followed by sequential items.The possible intervals between Tl and T2 were Lag-2(SOA 64ms),Lag-9(SOA 504ms).30 undergraduate and graduate students were instructed to make the identification response to the central arrow of the Tl item(left or right) and the identification response to the gender of the name(male or female).T1 load conditions were separately presented in two blocks and the order of these two blocks was counterbalanced across the participants. The Tl identification accuracy and the T2 detection accuracy in all conditions were recorded respectively. The results of this study showed that for low-load conditions,compared to the stranger-names,both of the self-names and the celebrity -names were detected more often than the stranger-names,showing the advantages of personal names and celebrity names.However, the advantage was missing with the increased Tl load,and the detection of stranger names had no significant difference between highload and low-load conditions,suggesting that the privileged access in the subjects'awareness to self-names and celebrity-names were more sensitive to the current available processing resources.But in the condition of " low-load and shot-lag",self-names showed the unique advantage of detection,while the advantage of celebrity-names disappeared.The results of this study show that the uniqueness of personal name processing is not absolute but relative.

The Relative Uniqueness of Personal Names:Evidences from the RSVP

The Process of Category-and-Specific-Identity Information Retrieval in Face Perception

The Influence of Self-Referential Stimuli on Duration Perception

Specificity in the processing of a subject's own name

An identity-irrelevant discrimination task reveals familiarity-advantage in face perception and no self-advantage in voice perception

The role of attention in the emergence of the evaluative and incidental self-reference effects

The self and a close-other: differences between processing of faces and newly acquired information

Using the attribute amnesia paradigm to test the automatic memory advantage of person names

Self-prioritization of fully unfamiliar stimuli

A Self-Reference Effect on Memory for People: We Are Particularly Good at Retrieving People Named Like Us

Distinct Effects of Stimulus Repetition on Various Temporal Stages of Subject’s Own Name Processing

Self-Related Stimuli Decoding with Auditory and Visual Modalities Using Stereo-Electroencephalography.

Does Implicit Self-Reference Effect Occur by the Instantaneous Own-Name?

Self-face recognition in attended and unattended conditions: an event-related brain potential study.

Listen to yourself! Prioritization of self‐associated and own voice cues

Breakthrough percepts of famous names

You are not enough: Inefficient search strategies persist for self-relevant targets1

Processing Self-Related Information Under Non-attentional Conditions Revealed by Visual MMN

Self-face Captures, Holds, and Biases Attention

Neural responses to one's own name under mortality threat.

Did I tell you something personal? The influence of the distinctive features on destination memory