Abstract:The processing of one's own-name is thought to be unique in that it has no need of attentional resource.The evidence from both behavioral and electrophysiological studies has showed that no attention is required for self identification.But there has new evidence from an fMR1 that the differences between one's own and other's name processing may be quantitative than qualitative in nature. And there is evidence that the attentional blink(AB) is not always survived by self identification under the high perceptual load,but the study ignores the familiarity of personal names and therefore is not conclusive about the uniqueness of self identification mechanism.The objective of this study was to inquire into the self identification mechanism by associating it with the Load Theory and RSVP of AB paradigm, and to investigate the advantages of self identification,i.e.,the uniqueness or familiarity of the self identification.We added the names of celebrity to this study.We supposed that in attentional blink paradigm the familiarity with others'names would produce a pattern of processing similar to personal names,which has relative uniqueness. In the present study,each trial consisted of a first target(T1,consisted of 5 arrows) and a second target(T2,a strangers name or a celebrity s name or oneis own-name ) embedded in a rapid series of visual presentation(RSVP) of 20 common nouns.The Eriksen flanker task was used to distinguish the level of Tl perceptual load,in which the participants were asked to determine the orientation of central arrow between other 4 congruent(low-load condition) or incongruent(high-load condition) arrows.All 22 items were presented in the black background of computer screen and immediately followed by sequential items.The possible intervals between Tl and T2 were Lag-2(SOA 64ms),Lag-9(SOA 504ms).30 undergraduate and graduate students were instructed to make the identification response to the central arrow of the Tl item(left or right) and the identification response to the gender of the name(male or female).T1 load conditions were separately presented in two blocks and the order of these two blocks was counterbalanced across the participants. The Tl identification accuracy and the T2 detection accuracy in all conditions were recorded respectively. The results of this study showed that for low-load conditions,compared to the stranger-names,both of the self-names and the celebrity -names were detected more often than the stranger-names,showing the advantages of personal names and celebrity names.However, the advantage was missing with the increased Tl load,and the detection of stranger names had no significant difference between highload and low-load conditions,suggesting that the privileged access in the subjects'awareness to self-names and celebrity-names were more sensitive to the current available processing resources.But in the condition of " low-load and shot-lag",self-names showed the unique advantage of detection,while the advantage of celebrity-names disappeared.The results of this study show that the uniqueness of personal name processing is not absolute but relative.

Did I tell you something personal? The influence of the distinctive features on destination memory

Did I text you? The influence of the mode of transmission on destination memory

Look at me, I'll remember you

Is There a Self-Positivity Bias for Destination Memory? Behavioral and ERP Evidence

Target recognition and lure rejection: Two sides of the same memorability coin?

Self-referential and social saliency information influences memory following attention orienting

Who said what to whom? Memory for sources and destinations in monolinguals and bilinguals

From location to configuration: Does the Structure of a Display stick in memory as strongly as target location?

Attention focused on memory: The episodic flanker effect with letters, words, colors, and pictures

It is not in the details: Self-related shapes are rapidly classified but their features are not better remembered

Why I remember that: The influence of contextual factors on beliefs about everyday memory

The Relative Uniqueness of Personal Names:Evidences from the RSVP

Memory retrieval effects as a function of differences in phenomenal experience

The Resiliency of Memorability: A Predictor of Memory Separate from Attention and Priming

Parallel effects of processing fluency and positive affect on familiarity-based recognition decisions for faces

Better memory for intrinsic versus extrinsic details underlies the enhanced recollective experience of negative events

And like that, they were gone: A failure to remember recently attended unique faces

Effects of internal versus external distinctive facial features on eyewitness identification

Forensic, clinical and everyday remembering: Exploring the role of perceived audience in changes across autobiographical memory recollections

Interactions of Emotion and Self-reference in Source Memory: An ERP Study

Perceptual memory for highly familiar people's body shape: manipulation of images of the self and friend