Abstract:The promulgation of'The Pilot Plan of Ecological Environmental Damage Compensation System Reform'established the system of the ecological environment damage compensation litigation filed by the provincial government and the State Department vests the provincial government the litigation right by way of authorization.It is inherently rational and feasible in the sense of corresponding to the traditional legal principle of right relief and legislative spirit of environmental protection that the ecological environment damage compensation litigation would be filed by the provincial government which accepts people's public trust to implement public resource management of ecological environment,but we can find that the authorized litigation faces the legitimacy dilemma that it is contrary to the principle of law-preserving,the correspondence principle of ownership and its remedies,and the correspondence principle of claims and object of litigation if we view the system deeply on its actual law and juridical logic basis under the current law and legal theory of China.The argument of some scholars who try to use the arbitrary litigation theory to interpret the legitimacy of authorization is impractical because it is neither consistent with four kinds of legal arbitrary litigation undertaking under the current legal system nor coincident with the sufficient condition for interests of litigation undertaker and his client.In the field of ecological environment damage compensation in China,the public environmental interests enjoyed by all members of society has had a relatively perfect adjustment through the system of environmental public interest litigation,which mainly includes the basic elements of the ecological environment and the overall ecological environment composed by those elements.But as an abstract community composed of all citizens,the state's property rights which relate to some natural resources constituting the basic elements of the ecological environment,such as land,water,forest and mineral resources are lack of legal remedy.To legislate a single law for establishing and standardizing the litigation system and properly coordinating the relationship between the ecological environment damage compensation litigation,environmental public interest litigation would be the optimal route selection for breaking the legal dilemma of authorized litigation.The single law should be devoted to complete the task of building China's legal system of ecological environment damage compensation in the aspects of subjects and basis of claim,ecological environment damage appraisal and assessment,compensation litigation rules and compensation funds management.

Ecological Damage :The Legal Problem of the Risk Society and the Route of the Environmental Legislation

[Environmental Damage Assessment: International Regulations and Revelation to China].

The Legislative Path for Responding to the Ecological Damage Caused by the Oil Spill in China

Legislative and judicial responses to public health protection under eco-environmental damage relief in China

On Substantially Public Interest Relieving by the Environmental Public Interest Civil Litigation

On the Legal Protection of Environmental Interests

System dilemma and standardization path of the ecological environment damage compensation litigation filed by the provincial government

An Exploration of Law Predicament of Environmental Right and the Solutions

On the Public Participation of Environmental Legislation from the Perspective of Risk Society

Legal Issues on Wetland Ecosystem Protection in Yellow River Delta

Reflection on the Legislation-establishing of Ecological Compensation System with Legal Principle

The Deficiency and Countermeasures of Private Legal Relief for the Ecological Damages to Natural Resources in China

On the Implication of the Ecological Integrity in the Environmental Law

Analyzing Construction of Legal System on Ecology in China

Western ecological environment protection from the perspective of circular economy law

Chinese Environmental Law: Effects of Academic Theory Viewed Through Three Decades of Implementing the Rule of Law

An empirical examination of liability for ecological environment restoration in the context of the Civil Code of China

Redefinition of the Ecological Tendency towards Law

The Concept of Ecological Civilization and the Land Legal System Construction of China

Legal Regulation of Habitat Fragmentation

Legal framework for"Environmental Damage Liability Insurance Law"