The Distinction and the Indication of the Opinions ——A Empirical Study on the Capability of the Financial Analysts in China

YIMING HU,GUANGMING SHEN,JIANGHUA CEN
2005-01-01
Abstract:This study examines whether the analysts' opinions or their conclusions are distinctive and indicative to the market, based on the published articles written by the analysts on the annual reports of the listed companies. The opinions are qualitative judgment of the analysts. The evidence indicates that the analysts have certain capability in the security analysis. But no strong evidence are found to support that they have quite specific ideas. The analysts would do their good or bad judgment with different information concerned and different methods used, and they would tend to use the methods more flexible and the information more explicit when they do the bad judgment. No apparent differences in information concerned and methods used in the analysis for the different industries, and failed/normal firms are found. The opinions of the analysts are quite dependent on the auditors' opinions and the present performance of the analyzed firms. However, the study indicates that the qualitative judgment of the analysts is valuable for prediction on the future performance of the listed companies.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?