Abstract:enough. However, the complications associated with IP from different sources, having incompatible test strategies and requiring several types of testers, make a difficult situation nearly impossible. The answer is to build at least some of the test hardware on-chip. Ideally, a DFT technology should scale to larger devices so that common test approaches can be used across several designs. Test hardware can be straightforward IEEE 1149.1 scan logic or complex and application-specific, built-in self-test (BIST) circuitry. When the DUT is placed in a special test mode, scan logic reconfigures a device's latches into serial shift registers. Predetermined test vectors then can be shifted into the DUT, a test executed, and the test results shifted out for analysis. BIST may use the same 1149.1 test access port (TAP) pins for control, but vector generation and analysis are provided on-chip by the BIST test circuitry. Different BIST schemes are appropriate for logic, memory, and some special functions such as analog-to-digital converters (ADCs) and digital-to-analog converters (DACs) and phase-locked loops (PLLs). A New design tools make it easy to include the right level of DFT with minimal overhead. Courtesy of Teradyne ntil recently, design for testability (DFT) had almost perfectly exemplified the conjunction of incongruous or contradictory terms: it was an oxymoron. Semiconductor companies acknowledged that they ranked DFT with unsettling concepts such as qualified success and deafening silence, but designing in testability always had been difficult. Consequently, manufacturers often solved the problem of reconciling design and test by avoiding it. The fact that the situation has changed is as remarkable as the cause. For many years, larger and faster ICs required larger and faster and more expensive ATE. The growth of the system on a chip (SOC) business has leapfrogged any possibility of continuing to follow this established test paradigm. Instead of IC size simply increasing each year by perhaps a million gates and a few more pins, SOCs today may integrate as many as 30 to 60 different intellectual property (IP) cores on a single chip. And, SOCs ignore the traditional segregation of memory, logic, and analog functions. Being faced with the need to test the very large chips that result from such an IP combination is bad

Design for Testability of Deep Sub-Micro SoC Chip

Design and Implement for Test in a Complex System on Chip

A Test Architecture for Test Reuse in SOC Design

Research of Design-on-Testability for SoC

Challenges for Progress in Test and Design for Testability

Low cost Design-for-Testability features for System-on-Chip: Case study

Design for Testability for System-on-Chip

Advanced Dft Features For An Industrial Application Soc

Design for Test of Digital System Based on Function and Structure

Testability Design for SoC Based on IDDQ Scanning

Software- Based Self-Testing Methodology for Embedded Processor Cores

Design for HW/SW Co-Testing Based on FPGA

An improved method for test chip design

Design for Testability Design Test Test Development Failure Diagnosis the Multiple Facets of Dft Figure 1. Closing the Dft Gap

DFT Strategy of SOC

Design-for-Testability and Test of Garfield Series SoC’s

Test Structure Design of "longtium"s2 Micro-Processor

Ethernet Controller SoC Design and Its Low-Power DFT Considerations

The Design For Testability Of Longtium Microprocessor

A DFT and Test Pattern Generation Methodology for an ARM Powered® SoC Design

Design of Testing Struture in Microprocessor Based on JTAG