Abstract:In the early years of the New Period, along with the constant improvement of the social and political environment, the contestations among the exponents in the academic circles became lively; the viewpoint that (″literature) is a special ideology″ was also hotly debated. In the beginning of 1988, Luan Changda and Dong Xuewen began to query about the essentiality of ideology, and brought a severe concussion to the concept of essentiality of literary ideology which was considered as the standard till that time, that triggered the contestation concerning the relationship between ideology and literature among the academic circles, which lasted for several years. The question whether the literature's true nature consists in ideology became the core proposition of the contestation. The essentiality of ideology recovered its predominant position in the contestation, and the scholars had sufficient and fruitful discussions on the definition of the basic concept of the ideology, the relationship between the literature and ideology, the dialectical relationship between the essentiality of literary ideology and the non-literary ideology, and the aesthetical ideology of literature etc. The fundamental premise of the deep probing into in the literary ideology is to understand correctly the original idea of the classic writers of Marxism and to clarify the ideology and its related concepts. As Lu Meilin said that too narrow or too broad interpretation of the connotation of the ideology is one of the main reasons that caused the disorder in the field of literature theories, and he pointed out that ideology is a concept about the whole organism of composing factors. Many scholars, such as Zhang Shouying, Bian Pingshu, and Li Sixiao, are interested in the composing factors of ideology. While they focused on the analysis of the concept of ideology, scholars like Feng Yi and Huang Lizhi adhered to the essentiality of ideology and launched the in-depth discussion on the relationship between the main role of literature and the nature of ideology. In the 1980s, scholars including Qian Zhongwen, Tong Qingbing and Wang Yuanxiang, deliberated on the aesthetical ideology and the aesthetical theory of reflection. In the field of the aesthetical ideology, they made a systematic and in-depth investigation on the nature of literature, successfully resolved the conflict between the literary ideology and the aesthetical consciousness, and opened a new window for us to understand the correlative contradictions between the form and the contents, the emotion and the reason, expression and representation, humanity and the class nature. Although there is a limitation in its failure to explain efficiently how to achieve the harmony between aesthetical consciousness and the ideological factors of literature, the aesthetical ideology transcended the bondage of pure epistemology, and fitted a dialectical link between the literary ideology and the aesthetical factors, and in this way enriched and developed the Marxist viewpoint on the nature of literature. In conclusion, when we affirm that the innate nature of literature consists in the ideology, we must know that literature also contains some non-ideological factors, and in order to prevent the tendency of simplicity and philistinism in the field of literary studies and to cognize the scientific literary phenomena, it is very important to penetrate into these non-ideological factors.

A Study on Economical Life and Chinese Traditional Literature (Symposium)

Thinking on Methodology in Culture History of Literature in Tang Dynasty

On Classic Literature on Economics and Contemporary Youth’s Understanding of Traditional Economic Thought

Unearthed Documents and Medieval Chinese Literature

The Interdisciplinary Studies Of Literature And Economics: Origins, Relations And Reflections

From History of Literature and History of Books up to Cultural History of Literature

Study on the Literature and Economy of the Song Dynasty---the Literati and the Cultural Entertainment Market in the Song Dynasty

The modern context and ancient resources of Chinese literature

Retrospect and Prospect: Development of China’s Economics in the Past 70 Years

About perspectives in Studies of Economical History (Symposium)

Perspective on the Study of Essentiality of Literary Ideology

A Study of Vernacular Narratives in Modern and Contemporary Chinese Literature

Changes in the Concept of Money and the Transformation of Agricultural Literature: Urban Novels of the Late Ming Dynasty

The Analysis of Economic Literature in Local Chronicles of Huaihe River Basin in Republican Period

The Discourse Power in the Studies of History of Chinese Literature

On Construction of Ecological Circumstances of Contemporary Fine Literature under Conditions of Knowledge Economy--diseussing Existing Circumstances and Its Replying Strategy at Joint of Centuries in Addition

The Think on the Study of Literature on the Record of Actual Events

The Dilemmas and Main Issues in the Research of the Historical Documents of Contemporary Chinese Literature

The Study of Russian Literary History from a Social-dynamic Perspective

Comparative Study of Chinese and Western Literature

Another Textual Research on the Political Culture of the Origin of New Literature