Abstract:The basic arguments for a mental image model of thought are based on neuropsychological evidence. Farah found that the same brain regions are activated during both mental representation and actual perception, while Bishiah found that brain traumas that affected perception, also affected the ability to create mental images. Pylyshyn on the other hand, argues that all mental images are guided by ‘’cognitive penetrability’’, thus on their very basis, are manipulated by certain propositional elements. Given this difficulty, Kargopoulos hinted towards further research, featuring shapes and solid objects, for which subjects have no prior extensive knowledge. This would force subjects to use non-semantic strategies of representation, meaning mental imagery. Hinton’s cube problem conforms to these requirements. Hinton’s problem aligns with the idea that spatial tasks (especially tasks with cubes that change layout) are guided by propositional cues (our knowledge about squares) and supports Pylyshyn’s position. Using one of the simplest objects, a cube, Hinton showed that as soon as this shape changes its mental arrangement in space, even suspicious -as to the nature of the experiment- participants will make mistakes that are not present when they manipulate a mental image of the cube sitting on its typical array [1-5]. Aim: Our goal was to investigate the relationship between spatio-visual skill and the ability for mental partitioning in healthy subjects. Methodology: We used 2 groups (344 participants) a control and an experimental one. In the control group, we presented a Moebius’ strip, in the experimental group, we presented the same Moebius’ strip and asked them to mentally represent it. All participants asked to mentally partition the strip. Results: Of the 344 participants, only 31 managed to give the correct number of vertices in space. Though people had a hard time manipulating the cube’s mental image, their success rates were much higher for the Hinton 1 task in which propositional representation was more accessible. Only 9 of the 344 participants could find the correct answer for the Moebius strip task in which mental manipulation of the strip image was impossible. Conclusions: We come to the conclusion that the relationship between ‘’seeing’’ and ‘’knowing’’ is more complex, not just on the level of the mental image level but also on the level of perception. Our findings bring back to the scientific background the idea that the mind’s selective attention to previous experience and cognitive schemas will decidedly affect human thought

Multisensory Cortical Processing of Object Shape and Its Relation to Mental Imagery

Nonvisual and Visual Object Shape Representations in Occipitotemporal Cortex: Evidence from Congenitally Blind and Sighted Adults

Neural networks active during tactile form perception: common and differential activity during macrospatial and microspatial tasks

The Multisensory and Multidimensional Nature of Object Representation.

Human Brain Activity Related to the Perception of Spatial Features of Objects

Simple Shape Feature Computation Across Modalities: Convergence and Divergence Between the Ventral and Dorsal Visual Streams.

Tactile discrimination of grating orientation: fMRI activation patterns.

Transient Activity in the Human Calcarine Cortex During Visual-Mental Imagery: An Event-Related fMRI Study

Multisensory approach in Mental Imagery: ALE meta-analyses comparing Motor, Visual and Auditory Imagery

Does shape discrimination by the mouth activate the parietal and occipital lobes? - near-infrared spectroscopy study

Dynamic shape integration in extrastriate cortex

Combined diffusion-weighted and functional magnetic resonance imaging reveals a temporal-occipital network involved in auditory-visual object processing

Dissociation between Attention-Dependent and Spatially Specific Illusory Shape Responses within the Topographic Areas of the Posterior Parietal Cortex

Adaptive Shape Processing in Primary Visual Cortex

Mind’s Selective Attention to Previous Experience

The Representation Of Shape And Texture In Category‐Selective Regions Of Ventral‐Temporal Cortex

Neuroanatomical correlates of haptic object processing: combined evidence from tractography and functional neuroimaging

Space-based and object-based visual attention: shared and specific neural domains

Objects Seen As Scenes: Neural Circuitry for Attending Whole or Parts.

Human Sensory Cortex Structure and Top-Down Controlling Brain Network Determine Individual Differences in Perceptual Alternations.