Preliminary Study of Hepatobiliary Specific Contrast Agent Gd-EOB-DTPA Used in Biliary Tree Imaging

梁亮,曾蒙苏,饶圣祥,金航,杨姗
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-0313.2010.08.013
2010-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the ability and characteristics of Gd-EOB-DTPA in depicting biliary structures and to compare the degree of biliary visualization of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography (EOB-MRC) with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP).Methods:16 patients (male 15,female 1) with known hepatic masses but without invasion of biliary system were enrolled in the study.All patients underwent MRCP and precontrast 3D GRE T1WI (3D VIBE) with fat suppression,EOB-MRC using 3D VIBE with fat suppression was done 30 minutes after Gd-EOB-DTPA injection.Signal intensity of liver parenchyma,intra-common bile duct (CBD) and intra-gallbladder (GB) as well as absolute value of contrast to noise ratios (CNR) of duct-liver were quantitatively analyzed pre and post contrast.Biliary visualization of EOB-MRC and MRCP was qualitatively assessed by using a Likert 5-point scale respectively and paired.Results:Signal intensity in the common bile duct before and 30 minutes after Gd-EOB-DTPA injection was 113.27±38.20 and 595.31±34.62 while 182.73±113.45 and 684.20±153.41 in the gallbladder.At the same time, absolute value of CBD-liver CNR was 131.13±33.29 and 86.56±48.44 while 105.91±45.96 and 125.59±50.45 of GB-liver.There were significant differences in signal intensities and absolute value of CBD-liver CNR between precontrast and after injection (P0.001),for absolute value of GB-liver CNR,there was no statistically significant difference (P0.05).Visualization rating of common bile duct,common hepatic duct,left hepatic duct and right hepatic duct using EOB-MRC and MRCP had no statistically significant difference,the rating was improved by using paired of MRCP and EOB-MRC,but there were also no statistically significant differences among paired and unpaired.Visualization rating of gallbladder for EOB-MRC and MRCP was 3.09±1.00 and 3.76±0.44,paired was 3.82±0.39,showed statistically significant difference (P0.01).For sub-branches of intrahepatic bile ducts,paired of MRCP and EOB-MRC (2.59±1.22) improved visualization rating,the rating of EOB-MRC (2.25±1.33) was higher than that of MRCP (1.67±1.33),but had no significant difference.Conclusion:EOB-MRC can perform satisfactorily in depicting all biliary structures,EOB-MRC and MRCP can complement with each other.The combination of both can improve biliary visualization and potentially provide the information of hepatobiliary function.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?