Temporal evolution of carbon budgets of the Appalachian forests in the U.S. from 1972 to 2000

J LIU,S LIU,T LOVELAND
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.09.028
IF: 3.7
2006-01-01
Forest Ecology and Management
Abstract:Estimating dynamic terrestrial ecosystem carbon (C) sources and sinks over large areas is difficult. The scaling of C sources and sinks from the field level to the regional level has been challenging due to the variations of climate, soil, vegetation, and disturbances. As part of an effort to estimate the spatial, temporal, and sectional dimensions of the United States C sources and sinks (the U.S. Carbon Trends Project), this study estimated the forest ecosystem C sequestration of the Appalachian region (186,000km2) for the period of 1972–2000 using the General Ensemble Biogeochemical Modeling System (GEMS) that has a strong capability of assimilating land use and land cover change (LUCC) data. On 82 sampling blocks in the Appalachian region, GEMS used sequential 60m resolution land cover change maps to capture forest stand-replacing events and used forest inventory data to estimate non-stand-replacing changes. GEMS also used Monte Carlo approaches to deal with spatial scaling issues such as initialization of forest age and soil properties. Ensemble simulations were performed to incorporate the uncertainties of input data. Simulated results show that from 1972 to 2000 the net primary productivity (NPP), net ecosystem productivity (NEP), and net biome productivity (NBP) averaged 6.2MgCha−1y−1 (±1.1), 2.2MgCha−1y−1 (±0.6), and 1.8MgCha−1y−1 (±0.6), respectively. The inter-annual variability was driven mostly by climate. Detailed C budgets for the year 2000 were also calculated. Within a total 148,000km2 forested area, average forest ecosystem C density was estimated to be 186MgCha−1 (±20), of which 98MgCha−1 (±12) was in biomass and 88MgCha−1 (±13) was in litter and soil. The total simulated C stock of the Appalachian forests was estimated to be 2751TgC (±296), including 1454TgC (±178) in living biomass and 1297TgC (±192) in litter and soil. The total net C sequestration (i.e. NBP) of the forest ecosystem in 2000 was estimated to be 19.5TgCy−1 (±6.8).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?