Abstract:Purpose: The aim of this clinical study was to evaluate the changes of alveolar bone morphology around the upper incisors before and after functional treatment in adolescents using cone-beam CT(CBCT). Methods: Thirty patients with skeletal Class II mandibular retrusion who were successfully treated with high-pull headgear-activator(HGAC) and Twin-block were selected and divided into 2 groups (HGAC and Twin-block groups), 15 in each group. CBCT was performed before and after treatment, to observe upper incisor movement in the alveolar bone and alveolar bone remodeling. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 20.0 software package to analyze the changes of alveolar bone thickness, angle of central incisor and alveolar bone before and after treatment. Results: Horizontally, the edge of the maxillary incisor appeared lingual movement in both groups, while the root apex appeared lingual movement in HGAC group and labial movement in Twin-block group. Vertically, the edge of the maxillary incisor was moved down and the root apex was moved up in all patients, whereas the moving distance was less in the edge and larger in the root apex in HGAC group. The thicknesses of major areas in the alveolar bone significantly increased in HGAC group, while in Twin-block group the labial thickness of the alveolar bone showed significant decrease and the palatal thickness showed significant increase. Moreover, the total thickness of the alveolar bone showed significant increase in both groups, yet Twin-block group showed more increase, and the angle of the alveolar bone showed more decrease in HGAC group. Conclusions: Both functional appliances can cause positive alveolar bone remodeling in maxillary incisor area. HGAC can achieve a controlled tilt inward movement of the maxillary incisors, intrude the incisors to a certain extent, and allow certain change in the bending angle of the incisor alveolar bone at the same time, which is conducive to improving ClassⅡcraniofacial pattern. Twin-block can tilt the maxillary incisor inward, suggesting that more attention needs to be paid to the control of the torque of the incisor when retracting anterior teeth in fixed orthodontic treatment after Twin-block functional treatment.

[Comparison of the Effects Resulted by Modified Maxillary Oblique Plate and Twin-block in Advancing Mandible].

The study of effects on the mandibular arch resulted by the application of Mandibular Lip Bumper combined with Twin Block

Evaluation of the three-dimensional mandibular changes of patients with skeletal class II malocclusion before and after Twin-block treatment

Craniofacial hard tissue changes with the modified Twin-Block appliance for treating the children with Angle Class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusions

Comparison of cephalometric measurements of the Twin Block and A6 appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion: a retrospective comparative cohort study

[Treatment of Angle Class II Division I Malocclusion Cases with Twin-block Appliance Combined with Face Bow and Intermaxillary Elastic: Report of 17 Cases].

Comparative Evaluation of Twin Block Appliance and Fixed Orthodontic Appliance in Early Class II Malocclusion Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial

[Efficacy Evaluation of Fixed Twin-block Appliance and Tooth Extraction in Skeletal Class II Malocclusion].

Effect of Semi-Fixed Twin-block Appliance on Temporomandibular Joint Remodeling

Banded versus modified appliances for anchorage during maxillary protraction

Dentoskeletal Effects of 2-Phase Treatment Versus 1-Phase Treatment with Extraction of 4 First Premolars in Nonhypodivergent Class Ii Patients

Analysis of the Efficacy of Twin-block Appliance on Maxillofacial Growth of Six Pairs of Monozygotic Twins

Effects of Twin-block vs sagittal-guidance Twin-block appliance on alveolar bone around mandibular incisors in growing patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion

Comparison of 2 modifications of the twin-block appliance in matched Class II samples

Mandibular advancement with clear aligners and functional appliances in the treatment of skeletal ClassⅡmalocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis

A finite element study comparing Advansync® and Twin Block in mandibular anterior repositioning

[Comparative study of alveolar bone remodeling around the upper incisor area after Twin-block and high-pull headgear-activator functional orthopedic therapy]

Evaluation of the effects of two functional appliances in the treatment of Class Ⅱ 1 patients by Pancherz's analysis

Comparison between twin block appliance and mandibular advancement on clear aligners in the improvement of airway dimension: incremental versus maximum bite advancement

Comparison between clear aligners and twin-block in treating class II malocclusion in children: a retrospective study

[Comparison of the application of micro-implant screw support and flat guide plate in the treatment of excessive deep overbite of lower anterior teeth]