Abstract:Introduction: The goal of this retrospective cephalometric study was to compare orthodontic outcomes in patients with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion malocclusion treated with extraoral headgear or mini-implants for maximum anchorage. Materials: Forty-seven subjects with Angle Class II malocclusion or Class I bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion were treated by retracting the maxillary dentoalveolar process by using the extraction space of the bilateral maxillary first premolars. Two anchorage systems were used. Group 1 (n = 22) received traditional anchorage preparation with a transpalatal arch and headgear; group 2 (n = 25) received mini-implants (miniplates, miniscrews, or microscrews) for bony anchorage. Pretreatment and posttreatment lateral cephalograms were superimposed to compare the following parameters between groups: (1) amount of maxillary central incisor retraction, (2) reduction in maxillary central incisor angulation, (3) anchorage loss of the maxillary first molar, (4) movements of the maxillary central incisor and first molar in the vertical direction, and (5) changes in skeletal measurements representing the anteroposterior and vertical jaw relationships. Results: The skeletal anchorage group had greater anterior tooth retraction (8.17 vs 6.73 mm) and less maxillary molar mesialization (0.88 vs 2.07 mm) than did the headgear group, with a shorter treatment duration (29.81 vs 32.29 months). Translational movement of the incisors was more common than tipping movement, and intrusion of the maxillary dentition was greater, in patients receiving miniplates than in those receiving screw-type bony anchorage, resulting in counterclockwise rotation of the mandible and a statistically significant decrease in the mandibular plane angle. Cephalometric analysis of skeletal measurements in patients with low to average mandibular plane angles showed no significant difference between groups, although greater maxillary incisor retraction and less mesial movement of the first molar were noted in the mini-implant group. In patients with a high mandibular plane angle, those receiving skeletal anchorage had genuine intrusion of the maxillary first molar and reduction in the mandibular plane angle, whereas those receiving headgear anchorage had extrusion of the maxillary first molar and an increase of mandibular plane angle. In contrast to the posterior movement in the headgear group, anterior movement of Point A was noted in the mini-implant group. Conclusions: In both the anteroposterior and vertical directions, skeletal anchorage achieved better control than did the traditional headgear appliance during the treatment of maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion. Greater retraction of the maxillary incisor, less anchorage loss of the maxillary first molar, and the possibility of counterclockwise mandibular rotation all facilitated the correction of the Class II malocclusion.

[Comparison of the application of micro-implant screw support and flat guide plate in the treatment of excessive deep overbite of lower anterior teeth]

A Clinical Contrasfive Study on Multiloop Edgewise Arch Wire or Flat Bite Plate in Assistant Treating Adults with Anterior Deep Overbite

Root resorption of anterior teeth by using elastic flat bite plate during orthodontic treatment of deep overbite

Effect of bite plate on dentofacial structures in adult orthodontic patients

Comparative Analysis of the Effects of Micro-Implant and J Hook Treatment for Adult Patients of Angle Class Ⅱ Division 1 Malocclusion with the Anterior of the Alveolar Vertical Macroplasia

Bite Opening Effect with Fixed Bite Plate

Research of Clinical Application of Bite Plane for Deep Overbite Correction

A Study of Closed Miniscrew Anchorage in Intrusion of Mandibular Incisors to Correct Deep Overbite in Adult Patients

Application of the microimplant treatment for Angle's Class Ⅱ Division ⅠMalocclusion with the vertical macroplasia of anterior of superior alveoli

Comparison of Two Treatment Method for Maxillary Incisors Intrusion

Myoelectricity study on wearing flat bite plate under different raised distances in deep overbite therapy

Research of Clinical Application of Segmented Arch Technique for Deep Overbite Correction

The Preliminary Clinical Study of Posterior Vertical Control of High Angle Non-Openbite Extraction Cases Through Microscrew Implant Anchorage

[Improvement of the mastication function of orthodontics combined with restoration in the treatment of deep overbite with severe lower anterior teeth attrition]

[Comparison of Treatment Results Between Implant Anchorage and Traditional Intraoral Anchorage in Patients with Maxillary Protrusion].

Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion

Microscrew anchorage in skeletal anterior open-bite treatment.

Craniofacial changes of high angle extraction cases treated with posterior vertical control through implant anchorage

Clinical application on the reinforcement of orthodontic anchorage with micro implant system

A Novel Biomechanical System to Intrude the Upper Incisors and Control Overbite: Posterior Miniscrew-Assisted Lever Arm and 2 Cases Report

Comparison of Treatment Outcomes between Miniscrew Implants and Transpalatal Arch Anchorage in Adults with Bimaxillary Dentoalveolar Protrusion