Evaluating Inter-fraction Variations in Tumor Volumes with Repeated 4D-CT
W. Lu,G. Neuner,Z. Wang,R. George,J. Wu,S. Sassor,W. Regine,S. Feigenberg,W. D'Souza
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.07.1733
2010-01-01
Abstract:To quantitatively evaluate the inter-fraction variation in tumor volumes with repeated 4D-CT under uncoached free-breathing conditions. A secondary objective is to examine the inter-fraction variation in the correlation between two moving tumor volume measurements ITV10 and ITVMIP. Six patients with thoracic tumors and five patients with abdominal tumors underwent 4D-CT simulations on 3 separate days using a Philips Brilliance CT scanner. At each session, patients underwent 4D-CT scans under uncoached free-breathing conditions. Tumor volumes incorporating motion were generated: ITV10 was defined as the union of GTvs. contoured on the CT of all 10 phases; and ITVMIP which was the GTV contoured on the CT generated via Maximum Intensity Projection reconstruction. All contours were drawn by a single physician (GAN). The correlation between ITV10 and ITVMIP was evaluated by calculating their difference, ratio, centroid distance, root mean squared (RMS) distance, Hausdorff distance (maximum distance of closest points), and the overlap index. We examined the inter-fraction variation in ITV10, ITVMIP, and their correlation, using ANOVA. For thoracic tumors, the mean ITV10 was 34.5 cc, the mean ITVMIP was 31.7 cc, the mean ratio of ITVMIP to ITV10 was 0.90, the mean centroid distance was 1.1 mm, the mean Hausdorff distance was 7.0 mm, the mean RMS distance was 1.7 mm, and the mean overlap index was 0.81 (range, 0.73-0.90). No variables demonstrated significant (p < 0.05) inter-fraction variation, though ITV10 changes ranged from -29% to 32% for individual patients (p = 0.58). Expanding the ITVMIP with a single uniform margin did not improve its overlap index with the ITV10. For abdominal tumors, the mean ITV10 was 246.0 cc, ITVMIP 202.0 cc, ratio of ITVMIP to ITV10 0.78, centroid distance 2.1 mm, Hausdorff distance 14.6 mm, RMS distance 3.5 mm, and overlap index 0.76 (range, 0.61-0.92). Again, no variables demonstrated significant inter-fraction variation, though changes in ITV10 were even greater in abdominal tumors: they ranged from -43% to 101% for individual patients (p = 0.09). When studied as a group, neither tumor volumes nor correlation parameters between ITV10 and ITVMIP demonstrated statistically significant variation between fractions, for both thoracic and abdominal tumors. However, individual ITV10 varied by as much as 101%, supporting the need for personalized adaptive radiotherapy.