Abstract:This paper investigates the conditions under which the phenomenon of of small is less likely to occur and their implications with regard to certain business and marketing issues. Based on recent findings in behavioral economics, the authors demonstrated that when the difference in outcome values reduces, disappears, or is no longer apparent, an alternative with a small probability is less likely to be overweighed. Further, the authors suggested a status quo effect in the weighting of a small probability with reference to people's wealth. By applying the theoretical results to a promotional context, the authors found that using a promotional incentive that offers a small chance of winning a large amount is more effective for high-priced products than for low-priced products. To test the hypotheses, three experimental studies using student subjects were performed sequentially. Each experiment had specific objectives and involved the use of a factorial design. In line with previous findings, Study 1 indicated that as the associated payoff sizes increase in choice problems, the overweighting of small probabilities tends to diminish.More importantly, when no value comparison is presented, the overweighting of small probabilities is less likely to occur. Moreover, it showed that there is a preference discrepancy between choice and matching and that the weighting of probabilities is more consistent in the matching context than in the choice context.In Study 2, the above findings were employed in issues related to lotteries and insurance pricing. The study demonstrated that consumers are more reluctant to buy a lottery or air insurance at a higher price, even if the expected payoff increases accordingly. Moreover, at the same price, the wealthier group of people is more willing to accept the lottery or insurance. Study 3 was a mixed experimental design involving eight products in four categories. In all four categories, the results showed that sweepstakes are more effective than premiumsin selling high-priced products;however, there is no significant difference between these two schemes when selling low-priced products. The findings systematically demonstrated that the of small probabilitiesis context dependent. The research provides incremental evidence for the contingent weighting model and consumer preference reversals. From the perspective of a behavioral researcher, given the different levels of outcomes, coupled with the uncertainty of how small probabilities should be interpreted, the results can be explained by differential attention and information processing. From the perspective of a decision theorist, the results reflect a strong boundary condition that contradicts the commonly held belief that probabilities and values are independent of each other. Finally, the findings have important managerial implications in successful pricing and promotional design.

Consumer Choices Under Small Probabilities: Overweighting or Underweighting?

Weighting of Small Probabilities and Its Market Applications

Riskier for Me or for Others? the Role of Domain and Probability in Self-Other Differences, in Risky Decision-Making

Extreme Outcomes Accentuate Overweighting of Low Probabilities and Underweighting of High Probabilities in Experience‐Based Choice

Not Too Much nor Too Little: Salience Bias in Mobile Plan Choices

Precise Versus Imprecise Promotional Rewards at Small Probabilities:

Probability Weighting in Commodity Futures Markets

Probability weighting and insurance demand in a unified framework

Cost-benefit Associations in Consumer Inventory Problem with Uncertain Benefit

Over- and underweighting of extreme values in decisions from sequential samples.

Probabilistic Outcomes Are Valued Less in Expectation, Even Conditional on Their Realization

On modeling human perceptions of allocation policies with uncertain outcomes

Too Little or Too Much Seller Assortment: The Effects on Buyers’ Purchase Probabilities in a Food Sharing Platform

Gambling under unknown probabilities as a proxy for real world decisions under uncertainty

Beautiful and Confident: How Boosting Self-Perceived Attractiveness Reduces Preference Uncertainty in Context-Dependent Choices

A Better Test of Choice Overload

On Frequency and Probability Weights: An In‐Depth Look at Duelling Weights

Nonlinear probability weighting can reflect attentional biases in sequential sampling.

Does Probability Weighting Drive Lottery Preferences?

Rationality and Psychological Accuracy of Risky Choice Models Based on Option- vs. Dimension-Wise Evaluations