Abstract:CIE has recently recommended a new color appearance model CIECAM16 to replace CIECAM02. It was also intended to recommend a uniform color space (UCS) based on CIECAM16, CIECAM16-UCS, for predicting color difference. However, there was a debate as to whether CIECAM16 can be used to predict color difference, since it takes tristimulus values calculated using the CIE 2 degrees observer as input, while tristimulus values for color difference are usually calculated using the CIE 10 degrees observer, as in the CIEDE2000 formula. Thus, further evidence is needed before CAM16-UCS can be recommended by the CIE as uniform color space. In this paper, we investigate the likely difference in color difference prediction when using CAM16-UCS, and its potential statistical significance. Firstly, the reflectance of each pair of color samples in the visual color difference datasets: BFD-P, Leeds, RIT-DuPont and Witt was generated based on the given tristimulus values. Then, color difference AE2,F and AE10,F, with F being the CAM16-UCS, can be computed under any illuminant using the 2 degrees and 10 degrees observers respectively. Comparison results showed that the difference between AE2,F and AE10,F was not statistically significant. Finally, both AE2,F and AE10,F were used to predict the visual color difference DV and the STRESS values between AE2,F and DV, and between AE10,F and DV respectively. Statistical tests showed that the differences between AE2,F and DV, and between AE10,F and DV were not significant. Hence this study shows that CAM16-UCS can be reliably used for predicting color difference. The findings are valuable for CIE to recommend CAM16-UCS as a uniform color space. Currently CIE TC1-98 is investigating the establishment of a new colorimetric system based on cone response tristimulus values LMS. It is expected that the reflectance datasets generated from the color difference datasets will be useful for the evaluation of any new colorimetric system.(c) 2023 Society for Imaging Science and Technology.

Three Different Luminance Components of Color Space Applying in Camouflage Effectiveness Evaluation

Camouflage target polarized detection of low illumination based on lαβ color space by the Chinese color system

Assessment of Camouflage Effectiveness Based on Perceived Color Difference and Gradient Magnitude

Comprehensive color solutions: CAM16, CAT16, and CAM16-UCS

Improvement and Application of Color Histogram

Preliminary application research of regression analysis in camouflage color matching

Investigation on Effects of Adapting Chromaticities and Luminance on Color Appearance on Computer Displays Using Memory Colors

A New Camouflage Texture Evaluation Method Based on WSSIM and Nature Image Features

Camouflage target detection of the best polarized reference direction based on LMS and lαβcolor space

Uniform Color Space for Color Storage

Camouflage Design of Analysis Based on HSV Color Statistics and K-means Clustering

The color matching design based on polynomial regression

Testing Colour Appearance Model Based UCS Using HDR, WCG and COMBVD Datasets

Testing Uniform Colour Spaces Using Printed Samples.

High-dynamic-range Colour Appearance Data to Verify CAM16-UCS

Evaluation of Color Difference Prediction with CIECAM16 Using CIE 2-and 10-Degree Observers

Color Difference Evaluation for Wide-Color-gamut Displays.

Background Luminance and Subtense Affects Color Appearance

The Llab Model For Colour Appearance And Colour Difference Evaluation

Uniform Colour Spaces Based on CIECAM02 Colour Appearance Model