VirtualDose-IR: a Cloud-Based Software for Reporting Organ Doses in Interventional Radiology
Wanli Huo,Yifei Pi,Mang Feng,Yaping Qi,Yiming Gao,Peter F. Caracappa,Zhi Chen,X. George Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ab0bd5
IF: 3.5
2019-01-01
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Abstract:A cloud-based software, VirtualDose-IR (Virtual Phantoms Inc., Albany, New York, USA), designed to report organ doses and effective doses for a diverse patient population from interventional radiology (IR) procedures has been developed and tested. This software is based on a comprehensive database of Monte Carlo-generated organ dose built with a set of 21 anatomically realistic patient phantoms. The patient types included in this database are both male and female people with different ages reflecting reference adults, obese people with different BMIs and pregnant women at different gestational stages. Selectable parameters such as patient type, tube voltage, filtration thickness, beam direction, field size, and irradiation site are also considered in VirtualDose-IR. The software has been implemented using the 'Software as a Service (SaaS)' delivery concept permitting simultaneous multi-user, multi-platform access without requiring local installation. The patient doses resulting from different target sites and patient populations were reported using the VirtualDose-IR system. The patient doses under different source to surface distances (SSD) and beam angles calculated by VirtualDose-IR and Monte Carlo simulations were compared. For most organs, the dose differences between VirtualDose-IR results and Monte Carlo results were less than 0.3 mGy at 15 000 mGy* cm(2) kerma-area product (KAP). The organ dose results were compared with measurement data previously reported in literatures. The doses to organs that were located within the irradiation field match closely with experimental measurement data. The differences in the effective dose values between calculated using VirtualDose-IR and those measured were less than 2.5%. The dose errors of most organs between VirtualDose-IR and literature results were less than 40%. These results validate the accuracy of organ doses reported by VirtualDose-IR. With the inclusion of pre-specified clinical IR examination parameters (such as beam direction, target location, field of view and beam quality) and the latest anatomically realistic patient phantoms in Monte Carlo simulations, VirtualDose-IR provides users with accurate dose information in order to systematically compare, evaluate, and optimize IR plans.