Abstract:Each corporate growth project is an option, in the sense that managers face choices--push ahead or pull back--along the way. Yet many companies hesitate to apply options theory to initiatives such as R&D and geographic expansion, partly because these "real" options are highly complex. In this article, the authors make the case that the complexity of real options can be eased through the use of a binomial valuation model. Many of the problems with real-options analysis stem from the use of the Black-Scholes-Merton model, which isn't suited to real options. Binomial models, by contrast, are simpler mathematically, and you can tinker with a binomial model until it closely reflects the project you wish to value. Suppose your company is considering investing in a new plant. To use the binomial model, you must create an "event tree" to figure out the full range of possible values for the plant during the project's lifetime--next year, at the end of the design phase, upon completion. Then you work backward from the value at completion, factoring in the various investments, to determine the value of the project today. These calculations provide you with numbers for all the possible future values of the option at the various points where a decision needs to be made on whether to continue with the project. The authors also address another criticism of real options: that gaps often arise between theoretical and realized values of options of all types. Such gaps may be largely the result of managers exercising options at the wrong time. To improve the way it manages its real options, a company can look out for the decision trigger points that correspond to the nodes on a binomial decision tree. The trigger points should not only tell managers when they need to decide on exercise but also specify rules governing the exercise decisions.

Incentives and Investment Timing: Real Options in a Principal-Agent Setting

McDonald and Siegel Meet Laibson: Dynamic Investment Strategies with Time-Inconsistent Preferences

Managers' Investment Timing Decisions under Endogenous Compensation Contracts

Distortions in Investment Timing and Quantity in Real Options with Asymmetric Information

Intensified distortion: Investment decisions with endogenous contracts and time inconsistency

Investment and financing decisions under optimal long-term contracting

Incentive Contracting under Ambiguity Aversion

Randomly Recurring Investment Opportunities : Real Options with Illiquid Projects

Real Option Duopolies with Quasi-Hyperbolic Discounting

Options, option repricing in managerial compensation: Their effects on corporate investment risk

Agency and investment with triggered time-inconsistent preferences

Optimal Effort in the Principal-Agent Problem with Time- Inconsistent Preferences

Option-like Contracts For Innovation and Production

Options , Option Repricing and Severance Packages in Managerial Compensation : Their Effects on Corporate Investment Risk

Optimal Compensation and Pay-Performance Sensitivity in a Continuous-Time Principal-Agent Model

A real-world way to manage real options

Research of Manager Stock Option Incentive Optimal Contract Based on Inequity Aversion and Risk Aversion

Dynamic Agency and the q Theory of Investment

Incentives in Principal-Agent Relationships

Learning, Investment, and Entrepreneurial Survival: A Real Options Approach

Why Do Employees Like to Be Paid with Options?: A Multi-Period Prospect Theory Approach