Abstract:The International Court of Justice (ICJ or the Court) has been criticized for its limited effectiveness and the many failures it has experienced. In order to understand and discuss the operation and problems of the ICJ, jurisdiction is the key issue. The jurisdiction of the ICJ falls into two distinct parts: contentious jurisdiction and advisory jurisdiction. This paper first provides a brief introduction to the Court and an overview of the ICJ's jurisdiction by way of some case studies. It then explores reform of the ICJ from a jurisdictional perspective, and discusses the theory and history of the ICJ's jurisdiction. To reform the ICJ will not be easy. It can be achieved through a step-by-step process. This paper does not advocate that the ICJ should adopt compulsory jurisdiction. The Court's jurisdiction was intentionally limited at its outset. Some have suggested the WTO dispute settlement system as a good example for introducing compulsory adjudication and appellate review on a worldwide level through constitutional reforms. However, the author believes it is not practical to re-build a totally new ICJ structure under the UN system. Instead of focusing on substantial reforms to the ICJ, there is different trend of reconstructing the international judicial system; namely, the proliferation of international Courts and Tribunals, especially the establishment of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea and the International Criminal Court. Under this approach, rebuilding a World Court with compulsory jurisdiction is not necessary. Such a step might even produce some conflicts with other fora. So, it suggests instead that the Court take a broad interpretational approach towards jurisdictional disputes. This is the most the Court can do under the current ICJ statute.

Global Justice and International Institutional Design:The Case of International Criminal Court

A Study on the Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court

A Theoretical Observation of International Jus Cogens

The Public Nature of Rights and World Justice: A Comparative Study of Cosmopolitanism and The Law of Peoples

Correction To: Conceptualizing and Measuring Global Justice: Theories, Concepts, Principles and Indicators

New Experiment of Global Governance? Inter-embedded Issues,Interrelated Mechanisms and the Rise of Civil Society——by Case-Studies of Trade and Climate Change

Reform of the International Court of Justice - A Jurisdictional Perspective

Is Nation-state Obsolete——Critical Studies on Global Justice

In Search of Legal Base for Global Justice:Disputes on International Meaning of Rawls' Theory of Justice

Chinese Constitutionality in Globalization Era

Politics and Justice at the International Criminal Court

Sovereignty of the International Criminal Court

Institutionalization of a human community with a future and principles of international law

Developing a Situationist Global Justice Theory: From an Architectonic to a Consummatory Approach

The China International Commercial Court: Establishment and Development in a Global Context

International Criminal Judicial Criteria and Chinese Criminal Judicial Reforms

Pushing the bar – elite law firms and the rise of international commercial courts in the world economy

A Chinese Approach to International Commercial Dispute Resolution: The China International Commercial Court

How Justice Multi-nationalism Becomes Available in China

Transnational Justice: Unveiling the Dynamics of International Administrative Tribunals and Administrative Law

THE INFLUENCE AND CONTRIBUTIONS OF CONFUCIANISM TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL LAW