Abstract:The Administrative Litigation Law of China 1989 paints a rosy picture in which the individual and the government face each other in court, both submitting to the judgment of the law. However, in reality, many administrative cases do not conclude with judicial rulings but largely with withdrawals by plaintiffs (varying between 30-57%). In recent years, coordination and settlement in administrative litigations are even advocated in the official directives.This paper employs national statistical data, articles and reports written by judges to demonstrate that in most situations, withdrawals in administrative cases have not only denied individual plaintiffs the opportunity to protect their legal rights through litigation, but also rendered illusory any potential contribution that litigations might have towards the rule of law. The large number of withdrawals indicates the degree of difficulty that the institution of administrative litigation faces. Efforts made by the Supreme People's Court to enhance the number of administrative cases or reduce the rate of withdrawal have failed to reverse the general pattern. The preference for coordination and settlement that courts at all levels have expressed in administrative litigation may be partly motivated by the prevailing judicial philosophy, but it is believed to be primarily a collective compromise that courts have made in face of challenging conditions.The paper indicates that the institution of administrative litigation, embedded in the contemporary political and social structure of China, cannot be a means for achieving constitutional governance in China, and its impact on social change is severely limited. To eliminate the obstacles to administrative litigation, the immediate priority should be the promotion of judicial independence and authority. In the long term, the reform depends on the growth of civil society and the perfection of democratic politics.

On the Plight of Campaign-Styled Administrative Enforcement of Law and China's Governance

Reflection on Administrative Litigation System under the Concept of "people Oriented"

Understanding the Cases of Dilemma of Administrative Enforcement in China

The Boundary of “Collecting Mistakes Whenever Discovered”

Punishing Polluters: Trends, Local Practice, and Influences, and Their Implications for Administrative Law Enforcement in China

Litigations Without a Ruling: the Predicament of Administrative Law in China

Reflections and Improvement on Campaign-style Crime Governance from the Perspective of "Maintaining Social Stability"

CADRE ROTATION AND CAMPAIGN MOBILIZATION IN CHINA'S ANTICORRUPTION ENFORCEMENT

The Analysis of the Untoward Circumstances and Routes of Administrative Policy-Making by Legal System in China

The Implementation and Reformation of Administrative Litigation Law in China

Analysis on the Problems of Agent Performance in Administrative Law

Social Management Innovation and Administrative Law Form Reform

A Re-Examination of the Function and Role of Administrative Lawsuit

When Fire Alarm Needs Police Patrol: Evidence from Regulating Firm-Level Pollutant Emissions in China

Administrative Self-regulation and Rule of Administrative Law:A Preliminary Invest

An Administrative Law Faced to Social Science

Intense Monitoring and Bureaucratic Support for an Anti-poverty Campaign in China

On the Approaches of Strengthening the Subject of Agricultural Administrative Law Enforcement:A Case Study of a City in Heilongjiang Province

Examination of Several Controversial Issues in the Administrative Litigation Law (Draft)

Citizens' Disregard of Illegal Administrative Acts

Reasons and countermeasures to enhance the construction of administrative law enforcement