Comparison of Two Methods for the Accessory Nerve Dissection in the Modified Radical Neck Dissection

WEN Jian-min,TANG En-yi,ZHU Feng
2009-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To compare the differences of two methods in dissecting the accessory nerve during modified radical neck dissection.Methods: We retrospectivly studied 81 patients with oral cancer at the stage of cN0 who had underwent the functional neck dissection from 2000 to 2005.There were two methods of accessory nerve dissection,One method of looking for accessory nerve was at the anterior border of sternocleidomastoid,And the other was at the anterior border of trapezius.We compared two methods in the time consuming,the probability of hurting accessory nerve by mistake,and the incidence of cervical-shoulder syndromes.Results: The method of looking for accessory nerve at the anterior border of sternocleidomastoid was simple and quickly,seldom disturbed by cervical plexus,seldom hurt accessory nerve by mistake.And the incidence of cervical-shoulder syndromes was lower.The average time consuming was 10-15 minutes.However,the method of looking for accessory nerve at the anterior border of trapezius was often disturbed by cervical plexus,and might hurt accessory nerve by mistake.The average time consuming was 20-30 minutes.Conclusion: The method of looking for accessory nerve at the anterior border of sternocleidomastoid was obviously better than the method of looking for accessory nerve at the anterior border of trapezius.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?