Surgical treatment of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of cervical spine

ZHANG Bin,DAI Min,TANG Ya-min
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3977/j.issn.1005 -8478.2011.19.05
2011-01-01
Abstract:[Objective]To compare the clinical outcomes and complications of different approaches for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament(OPLL) of cervical spine. [Methods]From January 2005 to March 2009,the clinical data of 56 patients with cervical OPLL were reviewed and analyzed.The operative approach,operative methods,operative time,blood loss,complications were recorded. [Results]All patients were followed up for 20 months to 6 years(mean,3.8 years).Twenty-five patients were decompressed through anterior approach.In these patients,the operative time was 220.00±35.82 minutes,the operative blood loss was 280.00±127.48 ml,JOA(Japanese Orthopedics Association) score before operation was 8.36±1.41,JOA score after operation was 13.52±2.00,and the improvement rate was 61.92%±16.46%.Seven patients developed complications.Twenty-one patients were decompressed through posterior approach.In these patients,the operative time was(118.57±22.20) minutes,the operative blood loss was(414.29±200.71) ml,JOA score before operation was 8.23±1.67,JOA score after operation was 13.70±1.64,and the improvement rate was 58.57%±15.36%.Five patients developed complications.Ten patients were decompressed through combined posterior-anterior approach.In these patients,the operative time was(309.00±51.09) minutes,the operative blood loss was(760.00±337.30) ml,JOA score before operation was 7.40±1.07,JOA score after operation was 13.70±1.64,and the improvement rate was 66.60%±13.29%.Three patients developed complications.Among the three groups,the operative blood loss and the operative time showed significant difference(P<0.05),the JOA score before operation,the JOA score after operation,the improvement rate and the complications showed no difference(P>0.05). [Conclusion]The clinical outcome of cervical OPLL treated through anterior approach,posterior approach and combined posterior-anterior approach is satisfactory.But the incidence of complications is high.When we select the operative approach for cervical OPLL,we should consider not only the pathogenetic condition of patients,but also our own technology.Each of the three operative approaches can be used.But it should be prudent when we select combined posterior-anterior approach for cervical OPLL.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?