Abstract:Background Adaptive capacity may serve as an indicator of the individuals' coping behaviors toward illness management and may contribute to day-to-day living with chronic illness and improved quality of life. Practical and well-constructed instruments for measuring adaptation have not been adequately explored. An English 15-item Coping and Adaptation Processing-Short Form (CAPS-SF) for assessing adaptation has been created and validated in line with the underlying tenets of Coping and Adaptation Processing theory, but there is no applicable Chinese version. Methods The CAPS-SF was translated and culturally adapted into simplified Chinese. Among Chinese adults with chronic illness, 81 patients were selected for cultural adaptation and 288 patients were approached for psychometric testing. Content validity was evaluated by an expert panel. Construct validity was tested by confirmatory factor analysis. Concurrent validity and predictive validity were analyzed by Spearman correlation coefficient. Reliability was assessed by internal consistency and test-retest coefficients. Floor/ceiling effect was calculated. Results Adequate content validity was ensured by the expert panel. A four-factor structure (resourceful and focused, self-initiated and knowing-based, physical and fixed, and positive and systematic) describing individuals' coping strategies was identified and verified. Concurrent validity and predictive validity were demonstrated by strong correlations with the confrontation of coping mode (r= 0.46) and a quality-of-life measure (r= 0.58). The McDonald's omega coefficient of total scale was 0.82. Split-half reliability and test-retest reliability were 0.87 and 0.87. No floor/ceiling effect was present. Conclusion The Chinese version CAPS-SF is a theoretically based and culturally acceptable instrument with sound psychometric properties. Further studies are advocated to refine its four-factor structure.

Reliability and Validity of the Ways of Coping Questionnaire for Schizophrenic Patients

The Development of Coping Style Scale for Adults

The Relationship between Self-efficacy and Coping Style of Schizophrenia Patients

The factor structure of coping strategies in schizophrenic patients

Examination of the Factor Structure of the Ways of Coping Questionnaire With Clinical Populations

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Solution‐Focused Inventory in College Students

Preliminary Development of Coping Style Scale for Middle School Students

Psychometrics Properties of Ways of Coping Questionnaire-Korean among College Students

Psychometric Testing of the Chinese Version of the Coping and Adaptation Processing Scale-Short Form in Adults with Chronic Illness

An Analysis of the Ways of Coping Questionnaire

Reliability and Validity of Problem-focused Style of Coping Inventory and Its Relation to Psychological Distress

The Chinese Ways of Coping Questionnaire: Assessing coping in secondary school teachers and students in Hong Kong.

A Factor Analysis of the Ways of Coping Questionnaire Based on Data from Saddening Experiences

The reliability and validity of internalized stigma of mental illness inventory in patients with schizophrenia

The Construct Validity of Scores on the Ways of Coping Questionnaire: Confirmatory Analysis of Alternative Factor Structures

Dimensionality of Coping: Factor Stability Using the Ways of Coping Questionnaire

The Reliability and Validity of the Historical, Clinical, Risk Management-Chinese Version

Correlation Study of Social Function Level with Family Support and Coping Style in Patients with Schizophrenia in Remission

Assessing the Structure of the Ways of Coping Questionnaire in Fibromyalgia Patients Using Common Factor Analytic Approaches

Validity of the Brief Resilience Scale and Brief Resilient Coping Scale in a Chinese Sample

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia