The clinical effect of quadripolar left ventricular lead in CRT therapy
Junjun DI,Ying ZHOU,Yifei XU,Xiaohong XU,Yiwen PANG,Jiang SHAN,Geng XU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2017.06.012
2017-01-01
Journal of Clinical Cardiology
Abstract:Objective:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical effect of quadripolar LV lead implanted in cardiac resynchronization therapy(CRT).Method:Retrospective analysis was performed on heart failure patients following successful implantation of St.Jude LV lead from January 2014 to December 2015 in The Second Affiliated Hospital,Zhejiang University College of Medicine,with 22 patients in quadripolar LV lead group and 24 in bipolar LV lead group.The duration of LV lead implantation procedure,the implanted position of LV lead and the selected pacing vector during the operation,as well as complications like phrenic nerve stimulation(PNS) and clinical effects like CRT response at 6 to 12-month follow-up were compared between the two groups.Result..There were no difference of left ventricular end-diastolic diameter(LVEDD),left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF) and concomitant disease between the two groups.The duration of LV lead implantation procedure in quadripolar lead group seemed shorter than those in bipolar lead group,although without statistical difference[(60.0±33.5)min vs (66.2--33.9)rain,P＞0.05],and apex pacing in quadripolar lead group was lower(0％ vs 16.7％,P＜0.05).During implamation,PNS was occurred in 8 cases in quadripolar lead group,7 of which were overcame by reprogramming pacing vector,and 5 cases in bipolar lead group,which were all changed their target vessel.After a me-dian follow-up of (13.4±4.1) months,LVEF and NYHA improved significamly (P＜0.05).Compared with bipolar lead group,LVEF had a greater improvement in quadripolar lead group at 6-month follow-up [(42.1±6.6)％ vs (35.1-±8.7)％,P＜0.05],and the same as CRT response(81.8％ vs 54.2％,P＜ 0.05).During follow-up,PNS was occurred in 4 cases in quadripolar lead group,which were all overcame by reprograrnrming pacing vector,and 2 cases in bipolar lead group,which were overeame by reducing output and increasing pulse width.LV lead dislocation was happened in one patient in quadripolar lead group at 1-month follow-up.Conclusion:Compared with bipolar LV lead,the Quartet quadripolar LV lead proved to be better at avoiding apex pacing,reducing PNS,shortening the LV lead implantation procedure and improving the clinical effect at short-time follow-up.