Abstract:Three strictly comparable cross-section household dataset,related to 1988,1995 and 2001,are used to analyze the rapid yet unequal growth of wage and the sharp widening of wage structure.Earnings functions are compared and the increase in both the level and the inequality of wages are decomposed into their constituent elements.Distinctions are made between the variables likely to represent human capital,discrimination,and segmentation.The evidence suggests that productive characteristics were increasingly rewarded as marketization The Gini coefficient of earnings rose by 10.7 percentage points in the first phase from 1988 to 1995.Whereas the mean wage increased by 67 percent,the pay of the 10th percentile rose by only 22 percent,and that of the 90th percentile rose by 97 percent.These changes are much larger than those of the second phase from 1995 to 2001.Moreover,the returns to education rose sharply,as did the returns to occupation-specific skills.The initially slight inverse-U shape of the age-earnings profile became more pronounced: a change consistent with human capital theory.Thus the productive characteristics of workers were increasingly rewarded in the labor market.However,there were also signs of greater wage discrimination against women.Moreover,the market forces operating in the growing private sector and the relative immunity of the state sector from those forces generated greater wage segmentation among types of ownership,and provincial differences in the pace of reform and in economic growth created spatial segmentation in wages that could not be removed by the equilibrating movement of labor.Decomposition analyses were conducted in order to examine the contribution of particular characteristics to the rise in the Gini coefficient.Only a third of earnings inequality and its increase could be explained: the unobserved determinants are clearly important to the increase in earnings dispersion.The discrimination variables accounted for only a small part of the increase.The segmentation variables made the most important contribution,and that was mainly due to growing wage dispersion among provinces.This result is supported by other evidence of powerful divergence in mean earnings among provinces(Knight,Li and Zhao,2001).Some but not all components of human capital were disequalizing.These particular changes are likely to represent the stirring of labor market forces.

The Impact of Labour Market Segmentation on Regional Economic Growth

Labor Market Segmentation: a Review Article

Labor Market Segmentation, Hukou and Urban-Rural Difference in Employment

Education, Human Capital And Regional Economic Differentials: An Empirical Test Using China'S Provincial Panel Data

Education,Human Capital and Regional Economic Differentials

Migration Networks in Labor Mobility Decision-making

The Degree and Characteristics of Urban-Rural Segmentation in Urban Labor Market:Evidences from Zhejiang Province

The Factors Analysis on Determination of Rural Labor Mobility Pattern:Based on the Investigation of Migrated Laborers in HangZhou

Marketization and Unequal Growth of Wage: Their Extent and Influence Factors

Institutional Labour Market Segmentation in China

Contrasting Paradigms: Segmentation and Competitiveness in the Formation of the Chinese Labour Market

Fragmented Growth:Why Economic Opening May Worsen Domestic Market Segmentation?

Driving force of urban growth and regional planning: A case study of China's Guangdong Province

Economic Liberalization with Rising Segmentation in China's Urban Labor Market*

Job Prospects and Labour Mobility in China

The Spatiotemporal Elasticity of Age Structure in China's Interprovincial Migration System

The Two-Tier Labor Market in Urban China☆Occupational Segregation and Wage Differentials between Urban Residents and Rural Migrants in Shanghai

The Double Dualism of Labor Markets Segmentation in China:Theory and Evidence

Labour Market Impact of Large Scale Internal Migration on Chinese Urban 'native' Workers

Hukou's impact on labor occupation segmentation

Housing Policy for Migrant Workers and Economic Growth