Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To develop and evaluate scaling and scoring assumptions, and the reliability and the validity of a Chinese version of the SF-36 scales.METHODS:A multi-stage mixed sampling procedure was used to select a representative sample of the general population. The sample size was 1 000 households. All family members of a selected household, aged 18 and older, completed a survey by self-administration. Formal psychometric methods for testing assumptions underlying item scoring and scale construction were used according to the standard procedure of the IQOLA Project.RESULTS:Of the 1 985 collected questionnaires, 1 972 were qualified. Of them, 1 688 (85.6%) were respondents. 1 316 respondents answered all 36 items, while the remaining (372 respondents) answered with one or several missing responses. Among the non-respondents, 65.5% were illiteracy or quasi-illiteracy. The assumption of equal intervals was violated for the VT and MH scales. The recoded item values were used to calculate scale scores. The clustering and ordering of the item means were approximately the same as that of the source version and other two Chinese versions. The items in each scale had similar standard deviations except those in the PF, BP, SF scales. The correlations between an item and its hypothesized scale were identical for all except the SF and VT scales. The scaling success rates of convergent validity were 0% for the SF scale, 75% for the VT scale, and 100% for the other six scales. The scaling success rates of discriminat validity ranged from 87.5% to 100% for all scales except for the SF scale. The Cronbach' alpha coefficients of internal consistency reliability ranged from 0.72 to 0.88, which were satisfactory for group comparison except 0.39 for the SF scale and 0.66 for the VT scale. The two-weeks test-retest reliability coefficient ranged from 0.66 to 0.94. Factor analysis identified two principal components: a "physical" factor and a "mental" factor. Taken together, these two factors could be used to explain 56.3% of the total variance.CONCLUSION:The Chinese version of the SF-36 Health Survey Scale has achieved conceptual equivalence and satisfied the psychometric scaling assumptions well enough to warrant wide use in China. Known-groups validity will give more meaningful evidences of the validity of the Chinese SF-36 scales.

Intelligence Scale for Chinese Adult: Development of National Norms with Urban Samples

Intelligence Scale for Chinese Adults:Reliability,Validity,and National Norms for the Elderly

The Intelligence Scale for Chinese Adults:Item Analysis,Reliability and Validity

The Chinese Intelligence Scale for Junior (CISJ):Norm

Estimation of Premorbid Intelligence Quotient of the Intelligence Scale for Chinese Adult

A Preliminary Study on Self-constructionals Scales (scs)of Chinese-Version

Application of ANSIE to Chinese Adults

Norm development of the Chinese edition of Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition

Reliability and construct validity of the Chinese version of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition

Development of Adaptive Skill Rating Scale for School-aged Children

Analysis of the character of Chinese adult intellectual development

A Study on Construct Validity of Chinese Intelligence Scale for Junior (CISJ)

Reliability of the Chinese Intelligence Scale for Junior

Development and Psychometric Tests of a Chinese Version of the SF-36 Health Survey Scales.

Psychological Health Diathesis Assessment System:Establishing National Norms for General Self-Concept Scale for Adults

The Adaptation of Intelligence Scale for Chinese Young Children

Norm of the screen for child social anxiety related emotional disorders in Chinese urban children.

The Chinese Brief Cognitive Test: Normative Data Stratified by Gender, Age and Education

Analysis of the Changes of Short Forms of WAIS-RC within 20 Years

Validation of the Emotional Intelligence Scale

Norm of the Depression Self - Rating Scale for Children in Chinese Urban Children