Reliability and construct validity of the Chinese version of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition
WANG Jian,ZOU Yi-Zhuang,CUI Jie-Feng,FAN Hong-Zhen,CHEN Nan,YAO Jing,DUAN Jing-Hui,CHEN Rao,YAN Li-Juan,HE Xue-Ling,JIANG Xue
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2013.09.011
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To examine the reliability and construct validity of the Chinese version of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition. Methods: Totally 1,757 persons aged above 16 years old w ere selected by stratified sampling based on the variables including age,sex and education level. They w ere assessed w ith the Chinese version of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition. Among the samples,84 persons w ere re-assessed after 22 days. The reliability of the scale w as assessed w ith internal consistency,test-retest stability coefficients,and construct validity of the scale w as assessed w ith intercorrelations of subtests and composite scores,and confirmatory factor analysis. Results: The average reliability coefficients in the subtests,process,full scale intelligence quotient( FSIQ) and index scores ranged from 0. 82- 0. 94,0. 79- 0. 83,and 0. 90- 0. 98 respectively. The test-retest stability coefficients of the subtests, process, full scale intelligence quotient( FSIQ) and index scores ranged from 0. 68- 0. 86,0. 61- 0. 72,0. 78- 0. 91 respectively. The intercorrelations of subtests ranged from 0. 65 to 0. 71 in the verbal comprehension,ranged from 0. 49 to 0. 57 in perceptual reasoning, and w ere 0. 61 both in w orking memory and process speed. The intercorrelations among the 4 index scores and the full scale intelligence quotient w ere 0. 76- 0. 88. The confirmatory factor analysis indicated the four-factor model w as fitted w ell. Conclusion: The Chinese version of Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition has good reliability and construct validity.