Results from Measurements of Large Aperture Scintillometer over Different Surfaces

Lu Li,Liu Shaomin,Xu Ziwei,Wang Jiemin,Li Xiaowen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-7313.2009.02.006
2009-01-01
Abstract:For surface flux measurements,large aperture scintillometer(LAS) has become more and more popular in recent years.Compared with traditional observation techniques,it can measure surface fluxes on a larger scale(500 m—10 km).At present,LAS observation is not common in China.Beijing Normal University,associated with other institutes,has carried out several short-term measurements of LAS at Xiaotangshan(Beijing,2002,2004).A long-term LAS site has also been constructed at Miyun(Beijing) in June,2006.Sensible heat flux(H) calculation with the LAS data of above measurements shows that the beam height of LAS and wind speed are sensitive factors for sensible heat flux measurement(HLAS),zero-plane displacement height is crucial unless the beam height is much lager than it,and Bowen ratio needs to be determined accurately over wet surface,while air temperature,air pressure and aerodynamic roughness length are not sensitive for HLAS.There are two key points of HLAS calculation under stable condition.First,there is much less agreement on the form which universal stability function fT should take.In this study,the fT function proposed by Andreas(as in the LAS manual)is used.Further more,since the iteration process of HLAS can not be convergence when low wind speed and very stable conditions appearing at night,ψm≥-5 is specified.Second,the scintillometer is unable to determine the sign of the heat flux.Richardson Number Ri can be used to determine atmospheric stability and fix the sign of HLAS.Besides,the sunrise-sunset time and net radiation could be used for this purpose if there is no wind and air temperature profiles.Therefore,a calculation scheme of 24-hour sensible heat flux observed by LAS is obtained after settling the above two key points.According to the observations mentioned above,LAS can measure surface fluxes both over homogeneous and heterogeneous surfaces.The daily and monthly variation of HLAS is analyzed.And the observation differences between eddy covariance system and LAS,need to be studied further combined with footprint model and energy unbalance of eddy covariance system observation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?