Abstract:Quantitative estimation of evapotranspiration (ET) plays a significant role in the mechanism study of water cycling and agriculture management. Remotely sensed satellites provide spatial continuous surface parameters, which make estimation of regional surface ET possible. However, surface parameters retrieved by remote sensing data is discontinuous temporally, which can only provide 1-2 instantaneous values at satellite over-passing time. Thus, time scale extrapolation process is of crucial necessity for daily ET estimation. Recently, many ET time scale extrapolation methods have been proposed, such as sine function method, constant evaporative fraction (EF) method, and crop coefficient method. It has been proved that different models have different applicability and accuracy over variant climate conditions and underlying surfaces. Many studies assemble these extrapolation methods into remote sensing models to estimate regional daily ET in China, however, little researches focus on the accuracy assessment of these methods. The purpose of this study is to compare and assess the accuracy of four commonly used ET extrapolation methods over variant climate conditions and vegetation types. The study was conducted at Gaoying flux site located in North China Plain and Tongyu flux long-term land surface processes observational station located in North-east China Plain to represent semi-humid and semi-arid climate respectively. The predominant crops of Gaoying site are winter wheat and summer maize planted in rotation. Tongyu long-term land surface processes observational station has two flux sites located on the sorghum and degraded grassland, respectively. Each site of Tongyu station as well as Gaoying site has an EC system to record half-hour latent heat flux and sensible heat flux. Four commonly used ET extrapolation methods selected from literatures were tested in this study. The selection was carried out considering their applicability to the Remote sensing data used. The first method is the constant evaporative fraction (EF) method, which assumes the evaporative fraction, defined as the ratio between latent heat flux and available energy is stable during daytime under fair weather. The second method is a variance to constant EF method (so called variant EF method), with a change that soil heat flux is neglected. One assumption implied in variant EF method is the average daily soil heat tends to be zero and could be excluded in estimating daily ET. The third method is sine function method, that proposed by the assumption that the ratio of instantaneous latent heat flux to daily ET to the diurnal trend of solar irradiance with a sine curve. The fourth method is the crop coefficient method, which implies the ratio of actual ET to reference ET (i.e. crop coefficient) stays stable during the day. Four wheat seasons and four maize seasons from 2005 to 2008 at Gaoying flux site, two seasons of sorghum, grass land and bare soil at Tongyu flux site are used in this study. By accumulating the half-hour LE measurements, daily ET is calculated and used as validation data. Results show that all the four methods have the similar patterns, but the variant EF method has the best accuracy and performs well over the typical croplands in north China. The assumption implying in the extrapolation methods that a certain parameter (such as EF, crop coefficient, etc.) remains stable during daytime does not work in the study areas. Therefore, estimation derived from morning satellite underestimates the daily evapotranspiration, but overvalues from afternoon satellite. The diurnal pattern of evaporative fraction will come next to get a better understand of extrapolation from instantaneous value to daily evapotranspiration, and a new extrapolation approach will be proposed.

Comparison of the Sensible Heat Flux Measurements on Different Spatial Scales in an Irrigated Cropland

Comparison of Turbulent Sensible Heat Flux Determined by Large-Aperture Scintillometer and Eddy Covariance over Urban and Suburban Areas

Comparison of Sensible and Latent Heat Fluxes from Optical-Microwave Scintillometers and Eddy Covariance Systems with Respect to Surface Energy Balance Closure

Comparison of the Sensible Heat Flux Determined by Large-Aperture Scintillometer and Eddy Covariance Measurements with Respect to the Energy Balance Problem in the Taklimakan Desert

Investigation of Spatial Representativeness for Surface Flux Measurements with Eddy Covariance System and Large Aperture Scintillometer

Numerical Simulation Research of Land Surface Process in the Region Between Cropland and Pasture

Water Flux Characterization Through Hydraulic Head and Temperature Data Assimilation: Numerical Modeling and Sandbox Experiments

A Comparison of Different Ground-based Radiative Temperature Measurement Methods on the Field Patch Scale

Comparison of Differences in Actual Cropland Evapotranspiration under Two Irrigation Methods Using Satellite-Based Model

Comparison of temporal extrapolation methods for evapotranspiration over variant underlying croplands

Comparison of different methods for corn LAI estimation over northeastern China

Estimation of evapotranspiration using a remote sensing model over agricultural land in the North China Plain

Turbulent Variance Characteristics of Temperature and Humidity over a Non-Uniform Land Surface for an Agricultural Ecosystem in China

An Observation Study of Surface-Air Exchanges and Energy Budget at an Agricultural Site in South China

[Characteristics of water and heat fluxes and its footprint climatology on farmland in low hilly region of red soil]

Comparison Of Latent Heat Flux Estimates Over Australia

A Comparative Study of Computing Methods of Soil Thermal Diffusivity, Temperature and Heat Flux

Quantifying the effects of advection on single crop coefficients over a humid paddy field for sustainable irrigation

Up-scaling the Latent Heat Flux from Instantaneous to Daily-Scale: A Comparison of Three Methods

Assimilating Multi-Source Data into Land Surface Model to Simultaneously Improve Estimations of Soil Moisture, Soil Temperature, and Surface Turbulent Fluxes in Irrigated Fields

Assessing the Accuracy of Eddy‐Covariance Measurement at Different Source Emission Scenarios